Absolute Zero

  • Thread starter Cod
  • Start date

Cod

324
4
What would happen to an object if it reached the temperature of absolute zero? Would it just freeze? Explode? Or does it depend on the object?
 

marcus

Science Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
24,713
783
Originally posted by Cod
What would happen to an object if it reached the temperature of absolute zero? Would it just freeze? Explode? Or does it depend on the object?
it would be immediately arrested by the police and cited
for a flagrant disregard of thermodynamic law
 

Integral

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,185
55
Theoretically,

At Absolute zero all electronic motion ceases. All of the electrons in the atom will be in the lowest possible orbitals.

Zero motion of a subatomic particle violates Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, so it is not possible to achieve this state.
 
21
0
"The statement that is found so often in elementary books and newspaper articles, that at the temperature T = 0 all molecular activity ceases, is entirely erroneous. Modern atomic theory shows that the atoms of a solid (or a liquid in the case of helium) at absolute zero have a store of kinetic energy, called zero point energy, which may be considerable. As a matter of fact, the zero point energy of liquid helium is so large (three times as large as the heat of vaporization) that a crystal of helium under its own vapor pressure would be unstable. Under pressure, however, the reduction in volume brings the helium atoms nearer together so that the fields of force may interlock and a crystalline solid may form."

Mark W. Zemansky, Temperatures Very Low and Very High

Temperatures very close to absolute zero have been achieved. Wear your mittens and galoshes so you don't get frostbite.

http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2001/NehemieCange.shtml
"The limit of all temperature is absolute zero. For many years physicists have been closing in on absolute zero. No one will ever succeed in reaching it, but many have come very close. To reach a very low temperature, such gases as helium have to be liquefied and such a methods have been used by physicists in Bell Labs in Holmdel, NJ. In 1987 physicist Steven Chu, a former Bell Labs scientist, and other physicists by the names of William Phillips and Claude Cohen-Tannoudji who also worked in the same lab came up with the idea of trapping atoms with lasers by lowering the temperature during their conversation over a lunch table in the lab's cafeteria. Chu and his companions, Phillips and Cohen-Tannoudji, figured out a way to lower the atom's temperature to one ten-millionth of a Kelvin above absolute zero or 0.1 µK. In 1997, ten years after patenting the idea of trapping atoms with lasers by lowering the temperature, he honored with a Nobel Prize in physics for all his work in Bell Labs. After 20 years of constant research the Low Temperature Lab at the Helsinki University of Technology managed to reach 280 pK or 280 trillionths of a Kelvin. However, in the year 2000 that record was surpassed when a piece of rhodium metal was cooled to 100 pK or 0.000,000,000,1 degrees above absolute zero by a team of physicists at this same lab."

http://ufbir.ifas.ufl.edu/chap04.htm [Broken]
"In laboratory tests, Hinton (1960) found that dehydrated larvae of the African chironomid Polypedilum vanderplanki (Diptera) could survive submersion in liquid helium (-270 C). This phenomenon seems related to its ability to tolerate extreme desiccation."

________________________________________

Temperature is defined formally in thermodynamic terms (partial derivative of internal energy with respect to entropy at constant volume, for example), so descriptions rendered in terms of molecular motion and such are likely to be slightly off the mark, and thermodynamic definitions incomprehensible.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Robert Zaleski

This is an interesting subject. This got me wondering what affect this would have on 'time', relating to an object approaching absolute zero. Isn't absolute zero diametrical to the speed of light?
 

HallsofIvy

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
41,711
876
No, "absolute zero" has nothing whatsoever to do with the speed of light OR relativity. Or are you trying to freeze light?
 

Robert Zaleski

What I'm asking is the affect this will have on an electron's velocity that's occupying a space approaching absolute zero. Wouldn't the electron in this environment be operating at a much reduced energy level, which I take as a reduction in velocity? Isn't an electron velocity at or near the speed of light? Doesn't time theoretically slow down as an object approaches the speed of light?. As such, would time be accelerating for an electron that's decelerating as it approaches absolute zero?
 
At absolute zero all atoms and molecules will completely stop moving, but these atoms/molecules have a mass. Photons and waves however don't have a mass and will do what they normally would do...
 
21
0
Temperatures below absolute zero.

By fiddling with the definition of temperature, physicists can come up with negative temperatures--one of many subjects I mean to study some day and never get around to, but here is some discussion from Temperatures Very Low and Very High by Mark W. Zemansky.
Achievement of negative temperatures.

"To produce negative temperatures we must find a subsystem with the following properties:
(1) The particles must have a finite number of energy levels;
(2) The particles must come to equilibrium with one another very rapidly; and
(3) The particles must come to equilibrium with their surroundings slowly enough to enable an experiment to be done.

"The first subsystem that was found to satisfy these conditions is the nuclear spin system, or nuclear magnets, of the lithium ions in a lithium fluoride crystal. These nuclear magnets can have four different energy levels when in a magnetic field. The behavior of particles which may be distributed among four energy levels is similar to that of a system which has only two energy levels. To save words, therefore, let us continue to talk about only two energy levels. In a magnetic field, nuclear magnets may align themselves either in the same direction as the field, as shown in the lower diagram of Fig. 5-4, or opposite the direction of the field, a state of higher energy shown in the upper diagram of Fig. 5-4.

"Under ordinary circumstances, there are many fewer nuclear magnets in the upper energy level than in the lower. The subsystem is in equilibrium with itself and also in equilibrium with the rest of the lattice, so that both the subsystem and its surroundings have the same positive temperature. Now suppose we quickly reverse the direction of the external field—so quickly, indeed, that the nuclear magnets are unable to follow the change of direction of the field. The large number of nuclear magnets which were formerly in the direction of the field (and in the lower energy level) now find themselves oriented opposite the field, and therefore in the upper energy level! The few nuclear magnets formerly in the upper state are now in the lower one. There has been a population inversion. After a small and rapid reshuffling, the nuclear magnets come to equilibrium with one another, and the temperature of the subsystem is negative. After a while (from 5 to 30 minutes), the subsystem cools off and comes to equilibrium with the rest of the lattice and regains its former positive temperature. This beautiful and important experiment was first performed by Purcell and Pound at Harvard University in 1951.

"But, how can one be sure that a population inversion has taken place, that is, that there are more particles in the upper energy level than in the lower? The answer is, by measuring the absorption and re-emission of electromagnetic waves whose wavelength A is connected with the energy difference of the two levels «, by the Planck relation, e = hc/lambda. When e is the small value associated with Zeeman levels, A is large compared with visible light, and is in the region of microwaves. When a beam of microwaves with this particular A is sent through the lithium nuclei, two processes affecting the beam take place:
(1) The beam is reduced in intensity by raising nuclei in the lower state to the upper state, the amount of reduction depending on the number of nuclei in the lower state. This is ordinary absorption.
(2) The beam is increased in intensity by causing transitions of nuclei from the upper state to the lower state. A nucleus so lowered emits a quantum of radiation in phase with the radiation that forced it down, and the consequent increase in intensity of radiation is proportional to the number of nuclei in the upper state...."
 

HallsofIvy

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
41,711
876
by Robert Zalesky Wouldn't the electron in this environment be operating at a much reduced energy level, which I take as a reduction in velocity? Isn't an electron velocity at or near the speed of light? Doesn't time theoretically slow down as an object approaches the speed of light?
Oh, is that what you mean? I'm afraid you have it very wrong. Electrons are just ordinary particles moving at ordinary speeds.
You may be thinking of "photons" (which gets back to my original question: "Are you trying to freeze light?"!
 

Eyesee

What kind of thermometer is used to measure absolute 0?
 
21
0
Low pressure helium gas thermometers can be used down to about 0.5 degrees Kelvin. The principle is simple enough; the lower the temperature the lower the pressure exerted by the helium.

Crystals of paramagnetic salts, especially cerium magnesium nitrate, can be used to determine very low temperatures close to absolute zero since the paramagnetic susceptibility is temperature dependent, as I understand the principle, which is not very clearly.
 

Robert Zaleski

quote:
by HallsofIvy Oh, is that what you mean? I'm afraid you have it very wrong. Electrons are just ordinary particles moving at ordinary speeds. You may be thinking of "photons" (which gets back to my original question: "Are you trying to freeze light?"!

Thank you for straightening me out about the velocity of an electron. Your absolutely right. Now, the question you posed to me regarding the freezing of light is intriguing. If you could stop or significantly impede light, what effect would this have on a photons relationship with time. Since time theoretically stops for an object travelling at the speed of light, would time be accelerating for a photon approaching absolute zero?
 
96
0
Absolute Zero is a phenomenon that can theoretically exist, absolutely no motion is not. Absolute Zero simply signifies the coldest something can possibly get (which is not all the way to the point of NO motion).
 
39
0
At T=0 entropy vanishes. What's the entropy of a photon?
 

Related Threads for: Absolute Zero

  • Posted
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • Posted
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Posted
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Posted
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Posted
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Posted
Replies
9
Views
892
Replies
2
Views
2K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top