Absorbed dose of nuclear radioactivity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the absorbed dose of gamma radiation from potassium-40 (K-40) in the human body. The initial calculations identified that 0.00234% of the body mass contains K-40, leading to an absorbed dose of 1.02x10^-6 Gy based on energy per decay. Further clarification was provided on calculating the number of K-40 nuclei using moles and Avogadro's number, resulting in approximately 3.52x10^18 nuclei, with 89% decaying to release energy. The total energy release from these decays was emphasized, along with the understanding that energy is emitted over time rather than instantaneously. The discussion highlights the importance of accurate calculations and understanding the decay process in determining the absorbed dose.
planesinspace
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


One kg of human body contains about 0.2% potassium of which 0.0117% is potassium-
40 (40K). 40K is radio active and in 89% of the time the product of the decay is a gamma ray of energy
1.46 MeV. If we assume that all of these gamma rays deposit their energy
in the body calculate the following:
1. Absorbed dose in the body



Homework Equations


Absorbed dose is equal to the amount of energy absorbed per unit mass, and equivalent dose = RBE * absorbed dose


The Attempt at a Solution


Well, I worked out that 0.00234% of the body contains the radioactive substance.(0.2*.0117). Then I converted the 1.46MeV to Joules, giving me 2.339x10^-13 J. THen I multiplied this by 42736 (which is 100/0.00234) to see how much is acting on the whole unit mass of the body (1kg) and I got absorbed dose = 1.02x10^-6 Gy.
Is my working way off?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is one more step that you may have done, although I don't see it here. The absorbed dosage is measured in terms of unit mass of tissue, rather than unit mass of isotope. You have found the mass of K-40 present in 1 kg. of tissue and the amount of energy released per decay of one K-40 nucleus. You will also need to find the number of K-40 nuclei present in 1 kg. of tissue.

You would make the standard calculation of the number of moles of K-40 present and then multiply by Avogadro's number to obtain the number of nuclei present. You can then find

(number of K-40 nuclei/1 kg. of tissue) x (J/K-40 nucleus) = (J/1 kg. of tissue) ,

which can then be converted into rads or Grays.

(There is a further factor which estimates the biological effect of various forms of ionizing radiation, which you would multiply the absorbed dose by in order to find the effective dosage in rems or Sieverts. For gamma-radiation, though, this factor is just 1. See, for instance, http://www.radiation-scott.org/radsource/2-0.htm .)
 
Last edited:
I have forgotten how to work out the number of moles, is it right to go n=M/MM so that M=1kg and MM=0.0117?
in that case I got the number of nucleii to be 5.147e25,
and then multiplied that by my previous answer for energy, and got a wopping 5.245e19 J.
 
Sorry I haven't gotten back to you sooner, but I've been on the road (1600+ miles in the past 3 days!) and have had only intermittent 'Net access...

Remember that the fractions you have been given are percentages. So the 0.2% of the 1 kg. of tissue which is potassium is 0.002 kg. = 2.0 gm. Of that, only 0.0117% = 1.17·10^-4 is K-40. So the mass of K-40 in 1 kg. of tissue is 2.34·10^-4 gm.

The molar weight of K-40 will be 40 gm. per mole, so this mass of K-40 represents

2.34·10^-4 gm / (40 gm/mole) = 5.85·10^-6 mole ,

which is

(5.85·10^-6 mole) ·(6.02·10^23 nuclei/mole) = 3.52·10^18 nuclei .

Of these, we are told 89% = 0.89 of them decay by gamma emission, which is 3.13·10^18 nuclei.

This is the number of decays that are releasing 2.34·10^-13 J each. You can now use this to find the total gamma emission energy release from the K-40 resident in the 1 kg. of tissue.
(It looks large, though nowhere near 10^19 J...)

It should also be kept in mind that all this energy is not released at once, but in an exponentially declining fashion, roughly over an interval of about 10 half-lives.
 
Last edited:
You are great at explaining without doing to much of it yourself, thankyou have you been very helpful!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top