Abstract Algebra: Parity of a Permutation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on determining the parity of a permutation, specifically using the example of the permutation (1 4 5)(2 3). It is established that an n-cycle can be expressed as (n-1) transpositions, confirming that (1 4 5) translates to two transpositions and (2 3) is one transposition, totaling three transpositions. Since three is odd, the permutation is classified as odd. Additionally, it is affirmed that the parity remains consistent regardless of how the permutation is expressed as a product of transpositions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of permutation notation and cycle notation
  • Familiarity with transpositions in group theory
  • Knowledge of the theorem regarding the parity of permutations
  • Basic concepts of abstract algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the theorem on the parity of permutations in detail
  • Explore examples of different cycle notations and their corresponding transpositions
  • Learn about the implications of permutation parity in group theory
  • Investigate the relationship between permutation groups and their properties
USEFUL FOR

Students of abstract algebra, mathematicians focusing on group theory, and anyone interested in understanding the properties of permutations and their parities.

Abraham
Messages
68
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How do I determine the parity of a permutation? I think my reasoning may be faulty.

By a theorem, an n-cycle is the product of (n-1) transpositions. For example, a 5 cycle can be written as 4 transpositions.

Now say I have a permutation written in cycle notation: (1 4 5)(2 3).

I say it is odd, because (1 4 5) can be written as two transpositions, and (2 3) is already a transposition, giving 3 total transpositions:

(1 4 5)(2 3) = (1 5)(1 4)(2 3).

Since the number of transpositions is odd, the permutation must be odd.
Agree or disagree?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Abraham said:

Homework Statement



How do I determine the parity of a permutation? I think my reasoning may be faulty.

By a theorem, an n-cycle is the product of (n-1) transpositions. For example, a 5 cycle can be written as 4 transpositions.

Now say I have a permutation written in cycle notation: (1 4 5)(2 3).

I say it is odd, because (1 4 5) can be written as two transpositions, and (2 3) is already a transposition, giving 3 total transpositions:

(1 4 5)(2 3) = (1 5)(1 4)(2 3).

Since the number of transpositions is odd, the permutation must be odd.
Agree or disagree?

Agree. Note that you are implicitly using a very important and non-trivial theorem, which is that even though a permutation may be written in many different ways as a product of transpositions, the parity is the same no matter which product you choose.

For example, a 5-cycle may be written as a product of 4 transpositions, or 6 transpositions, or 8, etc., but there's no way to write it as a product of 5 or 7 or 9...
 
Thank you, for the swift reply.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K