Abstract Algebra, rings, zero divisors, and cartesian product

jamestrodden
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The problem states:
Let R and S be nonzero rings. Show that R x S contains zero divisors.

I had to look up what a nonzero ring was. This means the ring contains at least one nonzero element.

R x S is the Cartesian Product so if we have two rings R and S
If r1 r2 belong to R and s1 s1 belong to S

(r1, s1) + (r2,s2) = (r1+r2, s1 + s2)
I am using * to denote multiplication here.
(r1, s1)*(r2,s2) = (r1r2,s1s2)

Since we are talking about zero divisors I am going to need the definition of multiplication in the Cartesian Product.

I mean i going to need that (r1r2, s1s2 ) = (0,0)

so r1r2 = 0 and s1s2 = 0 . But neither r1 = 0 = r2 or s1 = 0 = s2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jamestrodden said:
so r1r2 = 0 and s1s2 = 0 . But neither r1 = 0 = r2 or s1 = 0 = s2
Why'd you stop here?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top