Accelerating an electron from speed u1 to u2

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the time required for an electron to accelerate from speed u1 to u2 in a uniform electric field. The participant is confused about the integration process in the textbook, particularly regarding the left-hand side of the equation and its dependence on time. Clarifications are provided that the left-hand side loses the time derivative during integration, resulting in the function itself. The conversation emphasizes that the three-force from the electric field is assumed to be constant. Overall, the focus is on understanding the relationship between energy, velocity, and time during the electron's acceleration.
Alan Ezra
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
HW Template missing as it was moved from another forum
Hi!

I am trying to find the time for an electron to accelerate in a uniform electric field from u1 to u2.

In the textbook, I found that time is found by integrating d(u/(1-u^2/c^2)^(1/2))=(qE/m_0)⋅dt
and they get u/(1-u^2/c^2)^(1/2) = qEt/m_0 by integrating from t=0 and u=0 to t=t and u=u
I don't quite get the left hand side of the equation, what is it integrating with respect to? what if the particle starts at t=0 and u=u1 and end at t=t1 and u=u2?

Thanks a lot
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've suggested that this is moved to the homework forum.

The assumption here is that the three-force of the electric field is constant. How is the three force defined?

I assume you are trying to calculate time, in terms of the coordinate time in the IRF in which the electron accelerates from ##u_1## to ##u_2##.
 
PeroK said:
I've suggested that this is moved to the homework forum.

The assumption here is that the three-force of the electric field is constant. How is the three force defined?

I assume you are trying to calculate time, in terms of the coordinate time in the IRF in which the electron accelerates from ##u_1## to ##u_2##.

Thank you for the reply! Yes I am trying to calculate how energy and velocity change wrt time. I am actually following the reasoning of a book, and I cannot quite understand how it gets from eq 2.26 to 2.27. Isn't u a function of time too? why after the integration the left hand side stays the same? Thank you a lot!
IMG_2692.JPG

Alan
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2692.JPG
    IMG_2692.JPG
    38.7 KB · Views: 458
The left-hand side doesn't stay the same - it loses the time derivative. The integral of the derivative of a function is the function.
 
  • Like
Likes Alan Ezra
PeroK said:
The left-hand side doesn't stay the same - it loses the time derivative. The integral of the derivative of a function is the function.

Thank you a lot. That makes sense.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top