Accelerating ions using Van de Graaff help

AI Thread Summary
A user has converted a CRT television into a high-voltage source using its flyback transformer, creating a visible ionization effect. They aim to enhance this effect by introducing a Van de Graaff machine to increase the electric field around the high-voltage wire. However, the expected increase in ion flow and arc generation did not occur as anticipated. The discussion suggests that the electrons from the ground wire may be shorting the Van de Graaff's electric field, negating its intended effect. The conversation highlights the complexities of electric field interactions and the need for further experimentation to achieve the desired outcome.
blainiac
Messages
50
Reaction score
2
First, let me say hello to everyone on the forums!

A friend and I have converted a 36" CRT television into a HV source using its flyback transformer. We discharged the tube before taking anything else apart. We have the HV source attached to a thin wire, which causes the air around it to glow purple from ionization. When the wire is set to a certain distance from a larger curved grounded foil piece, you can feel the wind the ions create by bumping into neutral air, as well as a beautiful purple flow between the wire and foil.

Now, we had an idea to 'lengthen' the gap between the HV source wire and the ground and create a more noticeable wind by introducing a very large external electric field near the HV source wire. We decided to buy a Van de Graaff machine with the dome constantly being vacated of electrons, so both the Van de Graaff dome and HV source wire would be (+).

Our hope was that as our model (which had the grounded foil and HV TV wire at a fixed distance) would become more purple and eventually create an arc the closer we brought it to the huge (400 kV) field, because both the HV TV wire's electric field and the Van de Graaff machine's electric field being added together by the superposition principle for vector fields. It didn't do anything. :cry:

Any ideas? The only thing I can think of is the electrons from the ground wire are going past the HV TV wire and shorting the Van de Graaff machine's large electric field and negating any useful effect from it... Any ideas on how to get this thing working?

Here's a pic:
 

Attachments

  • idea.png
    idea.png
    36.4 KB · Views: 487
Physics news on Phys.org
what you have created by placing the vdg terminal close to the hv wire of the flyback transformer is a second electric field between the two. because the hv wire of the flyback is also a conductor the two electric fields (vdg terminal one side and ground other side) will concentrate their charge on the hv wire. Also since you have a very high positive voltage on the vdg terminal and a lower positive voltage on the hv wire of the flyback you essentially create an electron stream from the flyback wire towards the vdg terminal (electrons will always flow from the most negatively charge part to the most positively charged part, relatively speaking and something charged less positvely than something else is relatively speaking negatively charged) besides the original stream of electrons from the flyback wire to ground.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top