Acceleration after a Colission

  • Thread starter Thread starter lacyme
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
In a perfectly inelastic collision between a cement truck and a Volkswagen, the final velocity of both vehicles is determined by conservation of momentum. The correct final velocity after the collision is approximately 13.4 m/s (or about 30 mph), as both vehicles stick together. The average acceleration experienced during the impact is calculated to be around 6.85 g. When considering safety, riding in the cement truck is preferable due to its greater mass, which provides more protection. The kinetic energy lost during the collision can be calculated using the kinetic energy formula, but the specific values were not fully resolved in the discussion.
lacyme
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, Here's the questions.. (It's a long one!)

(A) Assume that a cement truck with a mass of 10,000 kg hits you while you were stopped at a traffic light, and that you are driving a Volkswagen with a mass of 750 kg. If the truck was traveling at 15 mph and the crash makes you stick together (you and the truck have the same final velocity), what is your final velocity? Ignore friction with the road.
(B) If the crash impact took 0.2 s, what was your average acceleration? Convert it to units of g, the acceleration of gravity.
(C) Solve the previous problem assuming you are in the cement truck instead of the VW. In which vehicle would you rather ride out the crash? Why?
(D)How much kinetic energy was lost during the collision? What percentage of the initial kinetic energy of the truck was lost during the collision?

For relevant equations... I guess x=1/2at^2? or v=d/t? And KE= 1/2mv^2

And my sucky attempt...

(A)The final velocity of the VW would be 30 mph in the direction the truck was moving, assuming that wikipedia is right in saying that in an elastic collision when m1 is much greater than m2, m2 will move at twice the initial velocity of m1 in the opposite direction m2 was originally going... or at least, I hope that's right!

(B)30 mph = 13.4112 m/s
13.4112/0.2 = 67.05600 m/s^2
67.05600m/s^2 / 9.81 m/s^2 = 6.85 g
For this one I'm not really sure that's right. Would that be average velocity, and not acceleration? and would that be for the VW, or for the driver? the question asked for *your* acceleration...

(C) Now for this one I'm really confused. I get the that trunk would start to have a negative acceleration because of the impact, but I'm not really sure how to calculate what exactly it would be. As for the second part, I know that I'd rather be driving the truck rather than the VW because the great mass makes it safer.

(D) For D... wow, at this point I'm *really* lost, exspecially if the last two are wrong/not solved. I guess for you could use the KE equation and plug in the new v to get the KE lost, but since I don't know how to find everything... :(

Thanks in advance for your help! Sorry if it doesn't make sense, I can totally clarify things if need be.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
lacyme said:
(A)The final velocity of the VW would be 30 mph in the direction the truck was moving, assuming that wikipedia is right in saying that in an elastic collision when m1 is much greater than m2, m2 will move at twice the initial velocity of m1 in the opposite direction m2 was originally going... or at least, I hope that's right!
It's not an elastic collision, it's a perfectly inelastic collision (the vehicles stick together).

Hint: What's conserved?
 
It seems that you know what to do, but that you just missed the part of the question that says the car and the truck stick together after the crash. So they MUST be traveling the same speed after the collision. In your answer for A (30mph) you put that after the truck hits the car, it suddenly doubles in speed!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top