Acceleration as a function of velocity - HW problem help

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a homework problem involving the acceleration of a particle defined by the equation a = -0.05v^2. Participants explore the integration of this equation to derive the velocity function and subsequently the distance traveled by the particle under specific conditions. There is debate over the validity of canceling "v" during integration, with some arguing it leads to undefined results if v equals zero. The correct approach involves treating the case where v is non-zero to avoid division by zero. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately applying calculus principles to derive the necessary equations for velocity and distance.
lonsalot
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The acceleration of a particle is defined by the relation a = -0.05v^2, where a is expresssed in m/s^2 and v in m/s. The particle starts at s=0 m with a velocity of 5 m/s. Determine (a) the velocity v of the particle after it travels 10m, (b) the distance s the particle will travel before its velocity drops to 2 m/s, (c) the distance s the particle will travel before it comes to rest.


Homework Equations



a = v (dv/ds)

The Attempt at a Solution



http://answerboard.cramster.com/Answer-Board/Image/cramster-equation-20081241357166333677983620400001528.gif

I don't think this is right because when I integrated the right side, it ends up being undefined?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
not sure if what I'm thinking is correct but its an idea:

a= dv/dt so we know dv/dt = -.05v^2. We can integrate that to get the velocity function.

once we have the velocity function we can integrate again since v(t) = ds/dt. we have initial conditions. its just an idea.
 
lonsalot said:
...I don't think this is right because when I integrated the right side, it ends up being undefined?

No it isn't!

\alpha=-0.05\,v^2 \Rightarrow v\,\frac{d\,v}{d\,s}=-0.05\, v^2\Rightarrow \int_{v_0}^v\frac{d\,v}{v}=-\int_o^s 0.05\,d\,s\Rightarrow \ln v\Big|_{v_0}^v=-0.05\,s\Rightarrow v=v_o\,e^{-0.05\,s}
 
Last edited:
Rainbow Child said:
No it isn't!

\alpha=-0.05\,v^2 \Rightarrow v\,\frac{d\,v}{d\,s}=-0.05\, v^2\Rightarrow \int_{v_0}^v\frac{d\,v}{v}=-\int_o^s 0.05\,d\,s\Rightarrow \ln v\Big|_{v_0}^v=-0.05\,s\Rightarrow v=v_o\,e^{-0.05\,s}

How can you just cancel "v" on both sides in second step , where it can take a value zero...
 
Just to set the record straight on Rainbow child's answer:
No it isn't!

LaTeX Code: \\alpha=-0.05\\,v^2 \\Rightarrow v\\,\\frac{d\\,v}{d\\,s}=-0.05\\, v^2\\Rightarrow \\int_{v_0}^v\\frac{d\\,v}{v}=-\\int_o^s 0.05\\,d\\,s\\Rightarrow \\ln v\\Big|_{v_0}^v=-0.05\\,s\\Rightarrow v=v_o\\,e^{-0.05\\,s}

This slightly wrong, it should be a == d(0.5v2)/ds not d(v2)/ds.
 
Hi.. just to go one step further, would the distance (with respect to time) equation be :-

\int{{{v}{}_{0}\over{e^{0.05\,t}}}}\,dt = -{{20\,v{}_{0}}\over{e^{{{t}\over{20}}}\,\log e}}
 
jayvastani said:
How can you just cancel "v" on both sides in second step , where it can take a value zero...

Easy, you just say that the step was valid for all non-zero values of v.
a=v\frac{dv}{dx}=-kv^2 (In this case, k=0.05)
From this step to the next, you have two options. Either v is always 0, in which case you have a solution for v, and you are not allowed to divide by v. Or v is different from 0, and you are allowed to divide by it.

suchara, the velocity as a function of time is not what you posted. Note that you used the expression for the velocity as a function of distance and replaced the x with t (A mistake).

v=\frac{v_0}{1+kv_0 t}
 
Back
Top