Acceleration for Position-time graphs

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around interpreting acceleration in position-time graphs. In the first graph, a negative slope indicates the object is speeding up, resulting in negative acceleration. Conversely, the second graph also has a negative slope but shows the object slowing down, leading to positive acceleration. The confusion arises from understanding the relationship between slope steepness and acceleration direction. Clarifying the second derivative's role in determining acceleration helps resolve the misunderstanding regarding the graphs' behaviors.
Yodaa
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
Physics news on Phys.org
Yodaa said:
1. http://www.physicsclassroom.com/Class/1DKin/U1L3a16.gif
2. http://www.physicsclassroom.com/Class/1DKin/U1L3a17.GIF

In the first graph, I get that that the slope is negative and that the object is speeding up
And in the second graph, the slope is negative and the object is slowing down
But I'm unable to understand why the first graph has negative acceleration while the second one has positive acceleration?

Your question reversed the graphs?
In the first graph, the slope is getting steeper, speed up.
In the second graph, slope is getting less steep, slowing down.
 
berkeman said:
Acceleration is the second derivative of the position versus time... :smile:
@berkeman I am sorry i don't understand how that relates to negative acceleration for the first and positive acceleration for the second:oldconfused:
 
mathman said:
Your question reversed the graphs?
In the first graph, the slope is getting steeper, speed up.
In the second graph, slope is getting less steep, slowing down.

@mathman that is exactly what i mentioned above...
 
Yodaa said:
@berkeman I am sorry i don't understand how that relates to negative acceleration for the first and positive acceleration for the second:oldconfused:

Do you understand the difference between the 2nd derivative of y=x2 and y=-x2?

Plot each of those two functions, and look at the nature of the curvature. One is curving UP, while the other is curving DOWN. So which one will give you a positive second derivative, and which one will give you a negative second derivative?

Zz.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top