Acceleration in function of time and distance

AI Thread Summary
Acceleration cannot be calculated simply as a = v/t or v = d/t when dealing with varying acceleration; these formulas apply only under constant conditions. Instead, the correct approach involves using the equation x = x0 + v0t + 1/2at^2, which accounts for acceleration over time. In this case, the distance must be doubled in the formula because it incorporates the effect of acceleration on the total distance traveled. It's crucial to understand the context and conditions of the equations being used to avoid confusion. Proper application of these principles leads to accurate calculations of acceleration.
sinnet3000
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Here is something that has got me confused a lot of times.

Suppose I have a distance of 11m and a time of 5 seconds and I want to know acceleration.

I would say that a = v / t and v = d / t so I could plug the second equation to the first equation having: a = d / t^2

Therefore I have a = 11 / 5^2m/s^2 but that is the wrong answer.

We also have x=x_0+v_0 t+1/2 at^2 so: a = 2d / t^2 which in that case is a = 2(11) / 5^2 and this is right.

But why is the reason that distance should be the double of it?? Can someone explain me please??

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
acceleration is not v/t and velocity is not d/t you got these wrong. Go back to the definition.
 
In case it's not clear, Curl is telling you a = v/t is only true for constant acceleration, and where v is a change in speed and t the time over which it happened. Similarly v = d/t is for constant speed etc. Since you have acceleration, the second is definitely not valid.
 
We also have x=x0 +v0 t+1/2at2

IS a correct equation...in this case, however, the nomenclature looks a bit different from those explained in the previous post. You always need to consider the applicability of an equation you wish to use against the conditions in the problem you are solving...in this equation
x0 is a fixed initial distance; v0 is a constant velocity and a is a constant acceleration...[it's potentially confusing when two of the constants have a subscript yet acceleration doesn't even though it is also a [fixed] constant.]
 
Thank you guys
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top