Acceleration of a bead sliding down a Helix

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether a bead sliding down a vertical helix can have zero vertical acceleration while still descending. The original poster calculated the acceleration vector and found that the vertical component, associated with the unit vector e_z, was zero, leading to confusion about the bead's ability to descend. They explored the relationship between radial and vertical components, questioning if a purely radial acceleration could facilitate downward movement. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the helix's geometry and the implications of the pitch angle on the bead's motion. Ultimately, the conclusion is that while radial acceleration can exist, a non-zero vertical component is necessary for actual descent along the helix.
physicsfun
Can a bead desecnd down a helix have zero vertical component for its acceleration? (i.e. If I found my result to only has coefficients for its horizontal radial component unit vector (e_r), but zero for that of the vertical unit vector (e_z) ! ... That means I got zero vertical component for its acceleration right? Otherwise, please define the unit vectors <e_r, e_phi, e_z> for me please...?)
Is it possible for the bead to still have its descend down a vertical helix if it has zero component for its e_z unit vector's direction? Note that it is an HELIX... so perhaps the radial component alone, something like centripetal accel, or something like that, can pull it down to allow its downward descend still?? or no...? Why?

(See below for the question & how I tried to approach it) :

QUESTION:

A ball is constrained to slide down a frictionless helix path, with the helix axis to be vertical. The radius of the helix is R and each of the successive circular motion down the helix (distance of vertical drop after going round one full circular motion), is, 2pi*b.

The helix can be described by cylindrical coordinates: r=R, z=b*phi.

a) Write out the position vector and velocity vector.

b) Assuming that the bead is released from rest and allowed to determine freely along the helix, using convervation of energy to determine the time dependence of the angle theta and the vertical component of accelration.

-----------
MY ATTEMPT:

I wrote out what represents the position and velocity vector, then used the conservation of energy equation, and integration to find angle phi, as shown below:

First, note unit vectors = <e_r, e_phi , e_s>, and d(e_r)/dt=e_phi*d(e_phi)/dt, and also d(e_phi)/dt = - [e_r*d(e_phi)/dt].

We found velocity vector to be v= R*(d-phi/dt)*e_r + b*(d-phi/dt)*e_z.

Thus, we also know that: acceleration vector = -R*(d-phi/d)*e_r + b*(d-phi^2/dt^2)*e_z

Now, using the conservation of energy equation of a ball falling from rest,
change of KE = change of PE, we get:
v=sqroot(2g*2pi*b).

Substituting the speed found from velocity vector: v=(d-phi/dt)*(R^2+b^2)^(1/2),
I get d-phi/dt= a bunch of constants.

So separating variables and integrating the resulting expression, we get phi:

phi=(sq.root[(4*pi*g*b/(R^2+b^2) ]*t (:confused:)

Taking the derivatives of phi twice with respect to time t, (which fits into the acceleration vector e_z coefficient component), however,
gives us zero.
i.e. d^2(phi)/dt^2 = 0 :eek: :eek: :confused:

Can this be right??

i.e. The acceleration vector= a= -R*((d-phi/dr)^2)*e_r + b*0*e_z = -R*((d-phi/dr)^2)*e_r ... only! :eek:

i.e. the accel vector only have its coefficient for the radial unit vector (e_r), but ZERO coefficient for its vertical unit vector (e_z). :eek: :eek:

Is this possible??

Does my result mean the vertical component of acceleration is zero? (What are the definitions for the unit vector e_r, e_z etc?) Is there something wrong with my set up? How then should I do it?

Please comment on the approach i used, whether i have missed some concepts, and suggest an alternative better approach. Thank you!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You shouldn't be too confused by the helix shape. All that matters is the inclination of the helix thread i.e. the 'pitch angle'. As the latter is constant along the helix it should therefore be sufficient to consider a bead constricted to a straight line with the same inclination angle.

The pitch angle of the helix is

alpha = arctan[b/(2*PI*r)] ,

where b is the pitch (vertical drop between full circles) and r the radius of the helix.


The acceleration of the bead along the helix is thus

a = g*sin[alpha] ,

with g the gravitational acceleration.


Projecting this again back onto the vertical gives the vertical acceleration

av = g*sin[alpha] *sin[alpha] = g * sin^2[alpha]



With

z= b*phi(t) = 1/2*av*t^2

you have therefore the time dependence of the angle

phi(t) = 1/2/b *av *t^2 .
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top