Acceleration of Cart Rolling Down Incline

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the acceleration of a cart rolling down an incline using conservation of energy principles. The cart has two wheels, each with a specific moment of inertia, and the total mass is considered in the calculations. The key equation derived is a = [M/(M + 2m)] g sin theta, which incorporates the mass of the cart and the wheels. Participants express confusion about the inclusion of the factor 2m and the treatment of rolling without slipping in the equations. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between translational and rotational kinetic energy in the context of rolling motion.
Dorothy Weglend
Messages
247
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A cart is rolling down an incline (angle to horizontal is theta). It has two wheels, each wheel has mass m and moment of inertia mR^2/2. The total mass of the cart and the two wheels is M. Using conservation of energy (assuming no friction between cart and axles), show that the acceleration of the cart along the incline is a = [M/(M + 2m)] g sin theta.


Homework Equations


K = Iw^2/2
K = mv^2/2
v = wR (w is angular velocity).
v^2 = 2as

The Attempt at a Solution



E0 = E1
Ug = 2(K_rolling) + K_trans

Letting d be the distance traveled on the incline, this gives:

Mgd sin(theta) = (Iw^2/2)2 + Mv^2/2 = Iw^2 + Mv^2/2

Using the given moment of inertia I = mR^2/2:

Mgd sin(theta) = (mR^2/2)w^2 + Mv^2/2

Mgd sin(theta) = mv^2/2 + Mv^2/2

v^2 = 2Mgd sin(theta)/(M + m)

v^2 = 2ad:

a = Mg sin(theta)/(M + m)



I can't figure out where they got the 2m from.

I've tried adjusting the height by the radius of the wheels, but that gets complicated, because there are two of them, at two different heights, and I can't believe that would lead to the formula they give.

When you all recover from New Years, I'd appreciate any suggestions :wink:
Dorothy

(This is from Serway and Jewett, btw, 10.89)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider motion starting from rest over distance x along the incline:

Mgx\sin\theta = \frac{1}{2}Mv^2 + 2(\frac{1}{2}mR^2)(\frac{v}{R})^2

2Mgx\sin\theta = (M+2m)v^2

On the other hand

v^2 = 2ax

2Mgx\sin\theta = (M+2m)2ax

a = \frac{Mg}{M+2m}\sin\theta
 
Last edited:
phucnv87 said:
Consider motion starting from rest over distance x along the incline:

Mgx\sin\theta = \frac{1}{2}Mv^2 + 2(\frac{1}{2}mR^2)(\frac{v}{R})^2

Ok, but I don't understand how you got that rolling friction term.

Why isn't it

2(\frac{1}{2})(\frac{1}{2}mR^2)(\frac{v}{R})^2

Isn't the KE of rolling friction

(\frac{1}{2}){I\omega^2}

Why would it be different in this case?

Thanks,
Dorothy
 
The condition states that the cart is rolling, which I suppose means that it's rolling without slipping. The condition for rolling without slipping is:

v=R\omega
 
Dorothy, I agree with your solution. Is there a possibility that the book is wrong?
 
thequirk said:
The condition states that the cart is rolling, which I suppose means that it's rolling without slipping. The condition for rolling without slipping is:

v=R\omega

Hi Quirk... Yes, I understand that bit. What I don't understand is what happened to the 1/2 in Iw^2/2, or if you prefer, Iv^2/2R.
 
Hi Hawire,

That was my thought, yes, that the book was wrong. But I've thought that before (smile) and it wasn't. Just want to make sure I understand all of this.
 
Back
Top