Acceleration of object at specific height?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the gravitational acceleration of an object at the height of communication satellites, specifically 35,700 km above Earth's surface. The correct formula for gravitational acceleration is derived from Newton's law of universal gravitation, where the distance from the center of the Earth must be used. Participants noted that while a table indicates the acceleration is 0.225 m/s², their calculations yielded slightly different results, such as 0.207 m/s², due to variations in constants used. The conversation highlights the confusion around the calculations and the importance of understanding the underlying formulas, particularly the need to account for the total distance from the Earth's center. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the challenge of mastering these concepts without relying solely on memorized tables.
KDprevet
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
This stuff is so confusing! I really wish I were better at math... I had to take precalc math twice, so please try and dumb this down for me.
1. Homework Statement

Communication satellites orbit the Earth at a height of 35700km above the Earth's surface. What is the acceleration of an object due to the gravitational attraction by Earth at this height?
The Earth has a radius of 6.38x10^6m and a mass of 5.98x10^24kg

Possible answers (m/s^2):
0.0028
0.0065
0.044
0.225
8.55

Homework Equations


This is what I need to know??

The Attempt at a Solution


EDIT: I just found a table of varying g with altitude and it directly states that a satellite at that altitude has an acceleration of 0.225 m/s^2. Still, how are we supposed to find this without memorizing a table?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
KDprevet said:
This stuff is so confusing! I really wish I were better at math... I had to take precalc math twice, so please try and dumb this down for me.
1. Homework Statement

Communication satellites orbit the Earth at a height of 35700km above the Earth's surface. What is the acceleration of an object due to the gravitational attraction by Earth at this height?
The Earth has a radius of 6.38x10^6m and a mass of 5.98x10^24kg

Possible answers (m/s^2):
0.0028
0.0065
0.044
0.225
8.55

Homework Equations


This is what I need to know??

The Attempt at a Solution


EDIT: I just found a table of varying g with altitude and it directly states that a satellite at that altitude has an acceleration of 0.225 m/s^2. Still, how are we supposed to find this without memorizing a table?
Have you studied any formulas which might tell you the force due to gravitational attraction between two masses separated by a given distance?
 
Force = G(m2+m1)/r^2 but this does not give acceleration. F=ma requires mass of the sattelite which i do not have.
 
KDprevet said:
Force = G(m2+m1)/r^2
It's m1*m2, not m1+m2. You don't need mass of the satellite.
 
Force = (6.6726x10^-11)(5.98x10^24)/(6.38x10^6)^2 ... this is not correct. What do I do? I tried adding the distance from the satellite to Earth surface, and the distance from the satellite to the middle of the Earth to r^2 and that didn't help. Plus, force isn't acceleration. Is that still the correct formula? what do I do with it?
 
KDprevet said:
Force = (6.6726x10^-11)(5.98x10^24)/(6.38x10^6)^2
This is the formula for acceleration due to gravity at(and near) the surface of the earth. The satellite is at a height 37500km from the surface. How far is it from the center then? Calculate that distance and use it in place of r.
 
Using that method, I got something like 0.207, which is not 0.225 but close? I don't like that it's not exact. This is really going to throw me off.
 
KDprevet said:
Using that method, I got something like 0.207, which is not 0.225 but close? I don't like that it's not exact. This is really going to throw me off.
I believe your answer is right. The values of mass of earth, G and radius of Earth are slightly different in each textbook. So, 0.207 is close to 0.225.
 
  • Like
Likes CrazyNinja
KDprevet said:
Using that method, I got something like 0.207, which is not 0.225 but close? I don't like that it's not exact. This is really going to throw me off.
.207 does seem somewhat off to me. Please post all your working.
There are two routes you can take: apply GM/r2, where r=R+h, R being the radius of the Earth and h the height; or you can just look at the ratio to surface gravity: gR2/r2. I tried both, and both gave me around .225.
 
Back
Top