Acceleration Of Tennis Racket (Linear And Rotational Quantites)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the total acceleration of a tennis racket during a serve, considering both translational and centripetal components. The context includes angular acceleration and speed, as well as the distance from the shoulder to the top of the racket.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between total acceleration, translational acceleration, and centripetal acceleration. There is an exploration of how to calculate these components using given values and assumptions about angular acceleration.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the calculations and assumptions regarding angular acceleration, while others are clarifying the relationships between the variables involved. There is a recognition of the need to reconsider the radius used in calculations, leading to a productive exchange of ideas.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the assumption that angular acceleration is constant, and some participants question the initial approach to calculating the radius and its implications for the total acceleration. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of the problem setup.

Pat2666
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
PROBLEM

During a serve, a tennis racket of mass 1.6 kg is given an angular acceleration of 157 rad/sec2. At the top of the serve, the racket has an angular speed of 13 rad/sec.
If the distance between the top of the racket and the shoulder is 1.4 m, what is the total acceleration of the top of the racket?

atotal = ? m/sec2

Okay so I'm having some trouble here. I know that atotal is the combination of atranslational and acentripetal, well rather the addition of the squares of each equal to the square of atotal, but I'm not sure how to solve for atranslational.

I know that acp = rw^2 and I solved using the values given to get 118.3m/s^2.

However, when it comes to solving at = ra I don't know how to get the angular acceleration. I'm pretty sure the initial angular acceleration isn't what you use, as I got the wrong answer, but how else do I determine it at the top?

Any help would be appriciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pat2666 said:
I know that acp = rw^2 and I solved using the values given to get 118.3m/s^2.
How did you get this result?
However, when it comes to solving at = ra I don't know how to get the angular acceleration. I'm pretty sure the initial angular acceleration isn't what you use, as I got the wrong answer, but how else do I determine it at the top?
Lacking information to the contrary, I would assume that the angular acceleration is constant.
 
Doc Al said:
How did you get this result?

Lacking information to the contrary, I would assume that the angular acceleration is constant.

I got it by first finding the radius of the racket (1.4m / 2 = 0.7m) and then multiplying that by the square of the 13 rad/s angular speed at the top of the racket.

0.7m * 13 rad/s = 118.3 rad/s

Well if that were true, referring to the constant angular acceleration, then would I still be on the right track following the idea of a^2 + b^2 = c^2?
 
Pat2666 said:
I got it by first finding the radius of the racket (1.4m / 2 = 0.7m) and then multiplying that by the square of the 13 rad/s angular speed at the top of the racket.

0.7m * 13 rad/s = 118.3 rad/s
1.4m is the distance between shoulder and the tip of the racket. Assume that the shoulder is the axis about which the arm and racket swings. (No need to divide by 2.)
Well if that were true, referring to the constant angular acceleration, then would I still be on the right track following the idea of a^2 + b^2 = c^2?
Sure.
 
Doc Al said:
1.4m is the distance between shoulder and the tip of the racket. Assume that the shoulder is the axis about which the arm and racket swings. (No need to divide by 2.)

Sure.

Oh I see! So the entire racket creates the circle, not just the top part!

Thanks! I just plugged it in instead of 0.7 m and it came out correctly. Thanks so much :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K