Acceleration of two bodies in circular orbit provided by own gravity

AI Thread Summary
To determine the radius of two bodies in circular orbit around a common point, one can use the relationship between gravitational force and centripetal force. The gravitational force between the two bodies equals the centripetal force acting on the outer body, leading to the equation m1*m2/dist^2 = m1v^2/r. Since the inner body's position changes, modeling the distance between the two bodies as a function of their masses simplifies the problem. The concept of "reduced mass" can further streamline calculations by allowing the problem to be treated as one effective mass in circular motion. This approach can help verify the solution's accuracy before applying the reduced mass concept.
Ry122
Messages
563
Reaction score
2
If two bodies are moving about a common point, with one orbiting the other, in a completely circular orbit, from knowing just their periods (which are equal) and the graviational constants of each body times mass, how would you determine the radius of each of their circular orbits?

You can get the velocity as a function of the period and radius.
And for circular orbits vo=sqrt(GM^2/ro)

But since the inner body's position is constantly changing you can't straight forwardly apply the above equation to the outer body can you?

And for the inner body it would be in circular rotation about a point below its surface, so I'm not sure how you would apply the equation in that situation.
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I came up with this idea. Would it work?




centripetal force on outer body = m1v^2/r

Force due to gravity = m1*m2/dist^2


force due to gravity will be equal to the centripetal force since it's in circular motion so




m1*m2/dist^2 = m1v^2/r



model dist between object one and two as a function of their masses (with centre of mass equation) to reduce to a one variable function and solve for r
 
Yes, that is just what you want to do. After you've solved it that way, look up how the concept of "reduced mass" can be used to replace a problem with two masses with an effective problem that is a lot simpler because it just has one effective mass going around in a circle with a radius of the distance between the real masses, rather than the actual outer mass going around the center-of-mass as you correctly describe the situation. Replacing the real problem with that effective problem does all the tricky arithmetic for you, but you should do it your way first to verify that it works.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top