Accelerometer activity recognition

AI Thread Summary
To recognize activities like walking, sitting, and falling using a 3-axis accelerometer, it's essential to analyze the collected data effectively. Plotting graphs of the data in the time domain can help identify distinguishing features among activities. If no clear distinctions are visible, reconsidering the approach may be necessary. Calculating the root mean square (RMS) acceleration could provide a more unified view of the data, while examining correlations among the x, y, and z components may also yield insights. Sharing the plots could facilitate further mathematical signal processing suggestions.
Jakeun
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I am currently trying to recognize different activities such as walking, sitting and falling, using a watch which features a 3 axis accelerometer. Currently I have performed 1 minute tests of each activity 20 times but I am struggling on what to do with the data. Does anyone have any suggestions?

I have tried to FFT the data but do not have any decent peaks to establish a difference among the activities. Maybe I should apply a high or low pass filter?

ANY suggestions or advice would be greatly appreciated as I am really struggling with this.

Thank you
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The first thing to do is plot graphs of the data from your tests (one test per graph) in the time domain, and spend some time looking at them. If I was doing something like this as a project at work, I would probably print out all the graphs and pin them up on the wall, and just leave them there for a few days to let my subconscious get to work on the data.

If you can't see any features that distinguish the situations, you probably need to think again about the concept. If you CAN see some distinguishing features, then you know what your mathematical signal processing needs to do. After that, if you attach a few of the plots here, somebody might have some ideas on how to do the math.

Presumably you don't know what was the orientation of the watch, so you might want to look at just the RMS acceleration (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^(1/2) rather than the individual x y z components. Or you might want to see if the three components are closely correlated with each other, or independent. But without seeing the data, those are just random thoughts.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top