Accuracy of the Formula xf=xi +vixΔt for Constant Velocity

  • Thread starter Thread starter anthony123456
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The formula xf=xi +vixΔt is accurate for calculating displacement under constant velocity conditions, as it assumes that the x velocity remains unchanged over time. Experimental results for xf should match mathematical calculations if the velocity is indeed constant, with negligible factors like air resistance. The relationship between speed and position is direct when there is no acceleration, meaning distance traveled is proportional to time. It is important to acknowledge that real-world factors may cause slight variations in velocity. Understanding these principles can help clarify the validity of the formula in practical applications.
anthony123456
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Is the following formula accurate?: xf=xi +vixΔt
This question is for the hypothesis in our lab report. If we solve for the xf experimentally (in the lab), will the answer we get be the same if I do it mathematically. If so, why?

Homework Equations


xf=xi +vixΔt
to solve for Δt, use: yf = yi + viyΔt + 1/2a Δt^2
vix is solved in the first part of the experiment...

The Attempt at a Solution


The following formula is accurate as the x velocity is constant, thus whatever distance traveled, the distance traveled will be the same per second. What else can I say about it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anthony123456 said:
The following formula is accurate as the x velocity is constant, thus whatever distance traveled, the distance traveled will be the same per second. What else can I say about it?
Yep. Maybe you are supposed to think of some reasons why the x velocity is not exactly constant in the experiment.
 
BruceW said:
Yep. Maybe you are supposed to think of some reasons why the x velocity is not exactly constant in the experiment.

Thank you for responding. I need to say why the answers for xf will be the same (mathematically and experimentally). The vix is always constant, according to our teacher (air resistance is negligible).
 
Then maybe you are supposed to talk about why the equation is true given that the velocity is constant. Do you know much about calculus?
 
maybe, and I will be learning calculus next year. Why do you ask?
 
BruceW said:
Then maybe you are supposed to talk about why the equation is true given that the velocity is constant. Do you know much about calculus?

How can I explain that the equation is true?
 
Well, you are given that the speed is constant, and how (in calculus) are speed and position related?
 
BruceW said:
Well, you are given that the speed is constant, and how (in calculus) are speed and position related?

I am not too sure... How are they related? Is it because there is no acceleration in the x-direction so speed and position are related proportionally, so to speak? This is a guess.
 
Last edited:
pretty much, but if you haven't done calculus, then I don't think you'd be expected to give this kind of answer. Maybe you are supposed to say why there is no acceleration in the x-direction, like why the air resistance doesn't affect the outcome in this case.
 
  • #10
Ok thank you, I will do my best. Thank's for the assistance!
 
  • #11
no problem!
 
Back
Top