Achieve Nuclear Fusion By Splitting Atoms

In summary, current fusion confinement concepts are too inefficient. Instead of wasting energy on starting the fusion reaction, we could use nuclear fission to start the reaction.
  • #1
Potopea Daniel
4
0
Fusion energy is very efficient and clean,but it's very hard to achieve it.That's why I think that instead of wasting energy on starting the fusion reaction we could use nuclear fission to start the fusion reaction.

It's a simple concept:just let more neutrons in the fission reaction.
This will raise the temperature (hopefully) to the one required to achieve fusion.

This is a theoretical,untested concept.

I would like to hear what you think about this subject!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Starting nuclear fusion using nuclear fission works. It's called a thermonuclear bomb. For verification, I recommend a field trip to Bikini atoll.
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42 and mfb
  • #3
There is a minimal size for fission chain reactions. The concept works, but it has to be a big bomb.
 
  • #4
mfb said:
There is a minimal size for fission chain reactions. The concept works, but it has to be a big bomb.
And a tough,heat-resistant reactor as well...
 
  • #6
Potopea Daniel said:
It's a simple concept:just let more neutrons in the fission reaction.
The number of neutrons release in the fission process is fixed, on average between 2 and 3, since each fission reaction can release 2 or 3 neutrons, with a small fraction (delayed neutrons) being released from certain fission products. One cannot increase the number of neutrons released from a given fission reaction.

Fission reactions can trigger fusion, but it is the temperature (from energy released by fission), not the neutrons that drive fusion, in addition to the high pressure involved. Such systems are initiated by prompt supercritical reactions, and are uncontrolled. Nuclear power systems are controlled, and not permitted to go prompt supercritical.
 
  • #7
mfb said:
It has been studied, but it would be too expensive.
and just silly. There were also proposals for using thermonuclear detonations for mining or excavation. The problem would the fallout and activation of surrounding material.
 
  • #8
Potopea Daniel said:
Fusion energy is very efficient and clean,but it's very hard to achieve it.That's why I think that instead of wasting energy on starting the fusion reaction we could use nuclear fission to start the fusion reaction.

It's a simple concept:just let more neutrons in the fission reaction.
This will raise the temperature (hopefully) to the one required to achieve fusion.

This is a theoretical,untested concept.

I would like to hear what you think about this subject!

Actually you have it backwards. The problem is that current fusion confinement concepts are too inefficient. Heating a plasma up to the temperatures needed to initiate fusion reactions is easy. We have been doing this for close to a century. The hard part is to design an efficient confinement configuration, that will capture enough of the heat from fusion to sustain the plasma at the desired temperature with minimal external heating.
 

1. What is nuclear fusion and how does it work?

Nuclear fusion is a process in which two or more atomic nuclei combine to form a heavier nucleus, releasing a large amount of energy. This process occurs naturally in the core of stars and is also used in nuclear power plants. In order to achieve nuclear fusion, the atomic nuclei must overcome their electrostatic repulsion and fuse together, releasing a tremendous amount of energy in the process.

2. How is nuclear fusion different from nuclear fission?

Nuclear fusion is the process of combining two or more atomic nuclei to form a heavier nucleus, while nuclear fission is the process of splitting a heavy nucleus into two or more lighter nuclei. While both processes release energy, nuclear fusion is much more efficient and produces less radioactive waste than nuclear fission.

3. What are the potential benefits of achieving nuclear fusion?

If achieved, nuclear fusion has the potential to provide a nearly limitless source of clean energy. It does not produce greenhouse gases or long-lived radioactive waste, making it a more sustainable alternative to traditional forms of energy. Additionally, the fuel for nuclear fusion, hydrogen, is abundant on Earth.

4. What are the challenges in achieving nuclear fusion?

One of the main challenges in achieving nuclear fusion is creating the conditions necessary for atomic nuclei to overcome their electrostatic repulsion and fuse together. This requires extremely high temperatures and pressures, which are difficult and expensive to maintain. Another challenge is finding materials that can withstand the intense conditions inside a fusion reactor without being damaged.

5. Are there any current efforts to achieve nuclear fusion?

Yes, there are several ongoing research and development projects around the world focused on achieving nuclear fusion. These include the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) project in France, as well as private companies such as General Fusion and TAE Technologies. While significant progress has been made, achieving sustained and controlled nuclear fusion on a large scale is still a major challenge.

Similar threads

  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
7
Views
733
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
12K
Back
Top