Acid-Base Titrations and Liquid Soap

  • Thread starter Thread starter arthur_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Liquid Soap
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about performing an acid-base titration on liquid soap, the impact of buffers on the results is highlighted. Buffers in soap can complicate titration since they may behave as acids or bases depending on the pH and chosen indicator. Specifically, when measuring Sodium Lauryl Ether Sulphate (SLES), the presence of buffers means that the titration will primarily reflect the buffering capacity rather than the SLES itself. To accurately measure SLES, it is suggested to determine the critical micelle concentration (CMC) of diluted samples instead of relying on titration. Aqueous titration is not suitable for measuring SLES due to the interference from buffers, which are often inorganic salts. Alternative methods, such as nonaqueous titration or advanced analytical techniques like NMR and spectrometry, are recommended for more precise identification and quantification of surfactants in the soap.
arthur_
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am doing an acid-base titration on liquid soap. I understand that buffers are used in soap. Would that affect the results of my titration? If so, how would I overcome this?

Arthur.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
What are you trying to measure?
 
sorry for the delay, chemisttree.

i'm trying to measure Sodium Lauryl Ether Sulphate
 
Buffers can titrate as acids or bases depending on the pH and the indicator you use. If a buffer is added to soap, you will be titrating buffer rather than the acid form of 'SLES'. I don't know the pKa of the monoester of lauryl ether sulfate but I'm guessing it is somewhere around -2 to -3. If you measure the pH of your soap and it is near neutral, you can be sure that all of the lauryl ether sulfate exists as the anion. You will simply be titrating the buffer

If you are actually trying to measure the SLES by titration, I would suggest that you instead measure the critical micelle concentration of a series of dilutions and back-calculate the initial concentration.
 
so i cannt measure the SLES by titration?
 
Not by an aqueous titration, and not without a set of conditions that can exclude the known buffering materials (those one can expect in the soap product). Most buffers can be expected as inorganic salts, and their interference might be removed by complexing agents in analytical methods found in the literature.

A nonaqueous titration uses a different solvent that presents a stronger conjugate acid than H3O(+) in the equilibrium. Water has to be rigidly excluded for these titrations to work.

The presence of other surfactants may make it difficult to determine one surfactant in the mix by CMC. These could be non-ionic, anionic, and cationic. If your soap is indeed an unknown, then other methods should be used that are more unequivocal. (NMR, other spectrometric methods).
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top