Acidic Hydrogens in Aspartame: Which Ones Are Most Acidic and Why?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ahhppull
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hydrogen
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on identifying the two most acidic hydrogens in the aspartame molecule. Participants suggest that the hydrogen on the carbon connected to the NH group and the hydrogen on the carboxylic acid (COOH) are likely candidates. The reasoning emphasizes that acidic hydrogens are typically attached to atoms capable of stabilizing a charge through resonance. Additionally, the role of electronegativity in determining acidity is highlighted. Understanding these factors is crucial for accurately identifying the most acidic hydrogens in aspartame.
ahhppull
Messages
59
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Aspart…

What are the 2 most acidic hydrogens in this molecule?and why?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I narrowed it to:

1) the H on the carbon wedge connected to NH
2) the H on the carboxylic acid COOH
3) the H on the NH
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Acidic hydrogens are going to be attached to atoms that can stabilize a charge the best through resonance, so draw some diagrams, and look at electronegativity, comparing them...
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
17K
Back
Top