Action and equations of motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept that adding a time derivative of a function of time and coordinates to the Lagrangian does not alter the equations of motion. The mathematical basis involves the action being modified by a term that integrates to zero at the endpoints, thus not affecting the variation. Participants explore the Euler-Lagrange equations to understand this principle better, emphasizing the importance of the chain rule in recognizing implicit and explicit time dependence. The conversation highlights that the addition of a perfect time derivative allows for transformations between different reference frames without changing the dynamics of the system. Overall, the integration of such terms leads to a consistent framework in classical mechanics.
TeTeC
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hello !

I'm reading Landau/Lifchitz's mechanics book.

At equation (2.8), the author explains that when I add a time derivative of any function of time and coordinates f(q,t) to the lagrangian, the equations of motion are unchanged.

I understand the mathematical development leading to S' = S + f(q(2),t_2) + f(q(1),t_1), but I can't see why the equations of motion don't change.

I've tried to substitude the lagrangian of equation (2.8) in the Euler-Lagrange equations to convince myself it works, but that doesn't seem to be a good idea.

If you don't have this book and can't see what I'm talking about, I can provide you with more details.

Thank you !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
More details would certainly be appreciated :)
 
Okay L'=L+\frac{d}{dt}f(q,t). Compute the E-L equations for S' defined in terms of L'. Can you do it ?
 
action.jpg
(click on it, obviously my attachment becomes very small...)

Like this ? If this is correct, I don't see why the two last terms should disappear...
 
Perfect so far. Now who's

\frac{d}{dt}f(q(t),t) equal to ? HINT: Chain rule, you've got both implicit and explicit time dependence.
 
That simply imply that you can sit in a different frame of reference /coordinate and see the system.
But you can prove that simply,
When the perfect time derivative dF is added to Lagrangian, to calculate the action you have to integrate a perfect differential dF. Then you get a function F which is the functions of position and momentum coordinates and their variation vanishes at the end points. So the variation of the function F also vanishes.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top