Action Definition: Integral of Lagrangian Over Time

  • Thread starter Thread starter o_neg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition
AI Thread Summary
The action is defined as the integral of the Lagrangian over time because setting its variation to zero yields the equations of motion. This integral represents the measurement of energy used, specifically the difference between kinetic and potential energy. While the interpretation of the integral can be complex, it can be visualized as the path a particle takes that minimizes energy usage. A reference to the Feynman Lectures on Physics provides further clarity on this concept. Understanding this framework is essential for grasping the principles of classical mechanics.
o_neg
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi,

why is the action defined as the integral of the Lagrangian over time?
i don't see the meaning of integral on the (kinetic - potential) energy

thanks,
ori.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The integral has no meaning by itself, but setting its variation equal to zero leads to the equations of motion.
 
You can see the integral as a way of measuring how much of something is used. So in this case, the integral measures how much (K-U) energy is being used up, and the path that a particle takes minimizes this (this isn't technically correct... it takes a 'stationary' path, but looking at it this way could be beneficial to the student visually).
 
thanks for the replay.

I found a detailed explanation in the Feynman lectures on physics vol 2
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Back
Top