Active Genes & Protein Expression: Why Can't Active Genes Give LacZ Expression?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sotellme
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Genes
AI Thread Summary
Active genes in yeast, specifically S. cerevisiae, can inhibit lacZ expression despite being in frame with the transposon due to their essential roles in the organism's growth. Approximately 80% of the yeast genome consists of these active genes, which are always turned on and may affect protein properties negatively when fused with other genes. The experiment yielded fewer blue colonies than expected, indicating that not all gene insertions result in lacZ expression. Certain genes may only express under specific conditions, such as low iron or the presence of certain sugars. Understanding which genes allow lacZ expression is complex, as the enzyme can still function even with significant amino acid attachments.
sotellme
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
all i learned about protein expression till now is gone, may i say, just because an explanation from my professor...i just hope that he was not right about this, since it turns my "world" up side down!

the aim was to investigate the different expression degrees of the yeast genes. we used S. cerevisiae. we transformed the yeasts with a transposon carrying a lacZ gene. by homolog recombination the transposon with the lacZ gene was inserted into the different yeast genes. we selected for blue colonies. we got different degree of the blue colour. it showed that we got less blue colonies than expected. i asked my professor and he explained;

-> because 80% of the yeast genome codes for active genes ( open reading frames without non sense stop codons) if the transposon was inserted into the active genes then lacZ can't be expressed even if the insertion was in frame with the active genes!

yes, this was what he told me. from my knowledge i thought it does not make any different which genes a DNA segment is inserted into. as long as the fusion is in frame between the different genes, then expression would be! now he said that it does not include active genes. WHY CAN'T ACTIVE GENES GIVE LACZ EXPRESSION?

BTW what kind of genes gave the expression of lacZ we got in this experiment? how can they give the expression of the lacZ?

thanks so much for reading and help!
 
Last edited:
Biology news on Phys.org
By active genes, you prof meant that about 80% of the genes have functions that essantial for the for the organism to grow. Therefore these genes are virtually always turned on. When you create a gene fusion by using random techniques, like the one you described, the fusion migth have an effect on the protein properties and therefore inhibiting the grow of or killing the organism. Also some genes are only turned on under specific condtions such as low iron, decreased temperature, presence of certain sugars, etc.

It is hard to define what genes would give permit the expression of the genes in the experiment you described. These genes will give a positive reaction with lacZ because this enzyme can fulfill its role even when the with significant amount of amino acid are attach to it. The expression is usually recorded using IPTG, a molecules that mimic lactose.
 
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top