MHB Acute angle of right triangles

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Triangles
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the properties of right triangles formed by a rectangle inscribed in a semicircle with a radius of 1. It is clarified that the acute angles of these triangles are not necessarily all equal to 45 degrees, as they depend on the rectangle's height. The area of the rectangle is set to 1, leading to a relationship between its height and width that can be solved using Pythagorean Theorem. Trigonometric methods can also be applied to find the angles, confirming that they can indeed be 45 degrees under certain conditions. Ultimately, both geometric and trigonometric approaches yield consistent results regarding the dimensions and angles of the triangles.
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

We have a rectangle inside a semicircle with radius $1$ :

View attachment 9703

From the midpoint of the one side we draw a line to the opposite vertices and one line to the opposite edge.

View attachment 9704

Are the acute angles of the right triangles all equal to $45^{\circ}$ ? (Wondering)

All four triangles are similar, aren't they? We have that the hypotenuse of each right triangle is equal to $1$, since it is equal to the radius of the circle.
I am stuck right now about the angles. (Wondering)
 

Attachments

  • rechteck.JPG
    rechteck.JPG
    3.5 KB · Views: 112
  • triangles.JPG
    triangles.JPG
    4.3 KB · Views: 108
Mathematics news on Phys.org
A little thought should show you those statements are NOT true! There exist many different such rectangles, with many different such angles, depending on the height of the rectangle.
 
HallsofIvy said:
A little thought should show you those statements are NOT true! There exist many different such rectangles, with many different such angles, depending on the height of the rectangle.

In this case the resulting smaller rectangles look like squares and that's why maybe I got confused. (Doh)

So when we know that the area of the big rectangle is $1$ and we want to calculate the length of the sides, it is not a good idea to use trigonometry, right? (Wondering)

It is better to do the following:

View attachment 9705

Let $x$ be the height and $w$ the width. Since $M$ is the midpoint we get that $w=2y$.
At the right triangle we can Pythagoras' Theorem and we get that $y=\sqrt{1-x^2}$.
The area of the big rectangle is $1$ so we get that $x\cdot w=1 \Rightarrow x\cdot 2\sqrt{1-x^2}=1$ and from that eauation we can calculate $x$. Btw we would get the same result if we would consider the acute angles to be $45^{\circ}$, so in this case they are indeed like that.
 

Attachments

  • height.JPG
    height.JPG
    3.5 KB · Views: 125
Last edited by a moderator:
mathmari said:
So when we know that the area of the big rectangle is $1$ and we want to calculate the length of the sides, it is not a good idea to use trigonometry, right?

Hey mathmari!

We can do it with trigonometry as well.
The width of the rectangle is $2\cos\phi$ and the height is $\sin\phi$, isn't it? (Thinking)
So the area is:
$$2\cos\phi \cdot \sin\phi = \sin(2\phi) =1\implies \phi=\frac\pi 4$$

mathmari said:
Let $x$ be the height and $w$ the width. Since $M$ is the midpoint we get that $w=2y$.
At the right triangle we can Pythagoras' Theorem and we get that $y=\sqrt{1-x^2}$.
The area of the big rectangle is $1$ so we get that $x\cdot w=1 \Rightarrow x\cdot 2\sqrt{1-x^2}=1$ and from that eauation we can calculate $x$.

Btw we would get the same result if we would consider the acute angles to be $45^{\circ}$, so in this case they are indeed like that.

Yep. That works as well. (Nod)
 
Thanks a lot! 😇
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top