Add. Angular Momentum: Finding j=2 States

Zero86
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There are two independent subsystems with angular momenta j1 = j2 = 1. States have to be found for the whole system with angular momentum j = 2.

Homework Equations



Basic procedure for addition of Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics

The Attempt at a Solution



Basically j = j1 + j2

I go through the states starting with 2 using the equations in the guide.
So basically we are limited to states
|2, 2>
|2, 1>, |1, 1>
|2, 0>, |1, 0>, |0, 0>

But I'm not sure if it's the right way to go through the states. Also, maybe there are better guides since I'm not even sure if this one applies to the problem. I'm looking into Clebsch–Gordan coefficients at the moment.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


What do you mean "the right way to go through the states"?
 


Well I have found that there are 2*2+1 = 9 states which are |2, 2>, |2, 1>, |2, 0>, |2, -1>, |2, -2>, |1, 1>, |1, 0>, |1, -1>, |0, 0>.
In 'big O' notation,
1X1 = 2+1+0+|-1|+|-2|
3*3 = 9
So these seem to be all the possible states. I'm not sure if it means I have found all the states. I'm not sure how they have come up with
\ket{j, j-1} = \sqrt{j_1 \over j} \ket{j_1, j_1-1, j_2, j_2} + \sqrt{j_2 \over j} \ket{j_1, j_1, j_2, j_2 - 1}
 


The states with total angular momentum j=2 are |2, 2>, |2, 1>, |2, 0>, |2, -1>, and |2, -2>. You're probably expected to find them in terms of the eigenstates of J1 and J2.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top