Adding f(x) and g(x): Domain and Output

  • Thread starter Thread starter Caldus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Domain Output
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the functions f(x) = √x and g(x) = x + 1, leading to questions about their sum and composition. The sum f+g(x) is determined to be √x + x + 1, with a domain of x ≥ 0 for real numbers. The composition f(g(x)) results in √(x + 1), requiring the condition x + 1 ≥ 0 for its domain. Participants clarify the importance of parentheses for proper interpretation of expressions. Overall, the conversation highlights the significance of domain restrictions when dealing with square root functions.
Caldus
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
If f(x) = square root of x and g(x) = x + 1, then:

1. What is f+g(x)?
2. Domain of f+g(x)?
3. What is f(g(x))?
4. What is the domain of f(g(x))?

I put:

1. square root of x + x + 1
2. x >= 0
3. square root of x + 1
4. All real numbers?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Number 4 depends on whether you "allow" complex numbers or not...
 
Originally posted by Caldus
1. square root of x + x + 1

Just to make sure, do you mean
sqrt(x) + x+1
or
sqrt(x+x+1)
??

2. x >= 0

OK (as long as you are only talking about reals)

3. square root of x + 1

Again, use parentheses.

4. All real numbers?

Nope. Example: x = -3.
 
In #2 you had already asserted that the domain of g+h (x)= √(x)+ x+1 is x>= 0 so you are talking about real valued functions of a real value (you can't take the square root of a negative number).

In #4, then, f(g(x))= &radic(x+1), you must have x+1>= 0.
 
Ug I hate it when I make mistakes like this! I knew how to do it and then when I'm under pressure I mess up everytime! Ack. So frustrating...lol... Oh well, just a quiz grade. Maybe I can make it up somehow...lol...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top