Adding Torque to a simple physics simulation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on simulating torque in a physics engine, specifically addressing the relationship between angular velocity and angular acceleration. It clarifies that angular acceleration is a vector aligned with the axis of rotation, while angular velocity is the first derivative of an angle, not an Euler angle. The conversation also highlights the importance of understanding rigid body dynamics and the need to properly frame questions regarding these concepts. Additionally, it explains how to determine the distribution of impulse between linear and angular momentum by conserving both forms of momentum. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately simulating the behavior of a rotating body.
EricMiddleton
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am trying to simulate a single rectangular body but I am having issues with Torque. I have an angular velocity variable (AngVel) and I have my torque calculations (Torque = Vertice:cross(Impulse)) and I get the angular acceleration (AngAccel = Torque/Inertia). The problem is that, from what I have read, the angular acceleration is a vector with the direction as the axis of rotation and the magnitude is the angle, but my angular velocity is actually a euler angle. Please correct me if I am wrong in my understanding. I just need to convert the axis-angle into a regular euler angle but I can't find how to do that. Also, How do I determine how much of the implulse is added to the velocity and how much is added to the angular velocity? Thanks for any help you can provide.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like you are confusing and conflating various concepts.
EricMiddleton said:
The problem is that, from what I have read, the angular acceleration is a vector with the direction as the axis of rotation ...
That much is correct. The vector representing the angular acceleration is along the axis of rotation.
EricMiddleton said:
... and the magnitude is the angle ...
This is where you start diverging from what is the case. The magnitude of angular velocity is not an angle, it is the second derivative of an angle with respect to time.
EricMiddleton said:
... but my angular velocity is actually a euler angle.
An angular velocity is not an Euler angle. An angular velocity is the first derivative of an angle with respect to time. I suspect you have a question about a rotating rigid body about an axis that changes direction in which case the Euler equations of rigid body dynamics would come into play. I suspect that you don't know how to ask your question properly.
EricMiddleton said:
Also, How do I determine how much of the implulse is added to the velocity and how much is added to the angular velocity? Thanks for any help you can provide.
You conserve linear and angular momentum. If the body is initially at rest, and the body receives impulse ##\vec J## at position ##\vec r## from its center of mass, the initial linear momentum is ##\vec P_i=\vec J## and the initial angular momentum about the CM is ##\vec L_i=\vec r \times \vec J##.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top