Addition of power series and radius of convergence

Poetria
Messages
267
Reaction score
42

Homework Statement



##f(x)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty x^n##
##g(x)=\sum_{n=253}^\infty x^n##

The radius of convergence of both is 1.

## \lim_{N \rightarrow +\infty} \sum_{n=0}^N x^n - \sum_{n=253}^N x^n##

2. The attempt at a solution

I got:
## \frac {x^{253}} {x-1}+\frac 1 {1-x}## for ##|x| \lt 1##

so the radius of convergence of the sum of these power series is just the same and equals 1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume you are asking for the radius of convergence of the given limit, so: No. Manipulate the expression inside the limit before taking the limit.
 
  • Like
Likes Poetria
Orodruin said:
I assume you are asking for the radius of convergence of the given limit, so: No. Manipulate the expression inside the limit before taking the limit.

I guess I should shift the index?

##\lim_{N \rightarrow +\infty} \sum_{n=253}^N x^{n-253}-x^n##

Then radius of convergence would be infinite?
 
That is not correct. Note that the series in your expression have a different number of terms!
 
  • Like
Likes Poetria
If I understand this correctly the difference between the two is:

## \sum_{n=0}^{253} x^n##

Perhaps they cancel each other except for this part?

Yeah I have noticed the number of terms isn't equal. :( Hm
 
Poetria said:
If I understand this correctly the difference between the two is:

## \sum_{n=0}^{253} x^n##

Perhaps they cancel each other except for this part?

They do indeed (except the new sum just goes to ##n = 252##). So does that sum depend on ##N##?
 
  • Like
Likes Poetria
Orodruin said:
They do indeed (except the new sum just goes to ##n = 252##). So does that sum depend on ##N##?
Not at all. That's clear. :) Oh yes to 252. Of course.
 
Therefore it converges for every x, am I right?
 
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes Poetria
  • #10
Orodruin said:
Yes.

Great. :) Many thanks. :)
 
  • #11
Poetria said:
Therefore it converges for every x, am I right?

Well, it is just a finite polynomial in x, so why would it ever diverge?
 
  • Like
Likes Poetria
  • #12
Ray Vickson said:
Well, it is just a finite polynomial in x, so why would it ever diverge?

:) True. I guess the concept of radius of convergence seems a bit tricky to me and I am overegging the pudding. :( Wolfram Alpha doesn't help.
 
  • #13
Poetria said:
:) True. I guess the concept of radius of convergence seems a bit tricky to me and I am overegging the pudding. :( Wolfram Alpha doesn't help.

In a way, this question is trickier than it looks. For any finite ##N > n## the difference ##S_n(x) = \sum_{k=0}^N x^k - \sum_{k=n+1}^N x^k## is just ##1+x+x^2 + \cdots + x^n##, a finite polynomial that exists and makes sense for all ##x##. However, when we go to the limit ##N \to \infty##, the difference ##\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} x^k - \sum_{k=n+1}^{\infty} x^k## only makes sense when each of the sums converge, so only if ##|x| < 1##. On the other hand, we have##1+x+x^2 + \cdots + x^n = \sum_{k=0}^N x^k - \sum_{k=n+1}^N x^k## for ALL ##N > n##, so is true also in the limit! In other words ##\lim (\sum - \sum )## is always OK but ## (\lim \sum) - (\lim \sum) ## might not be.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Poetria
  • #14
Ray Vickson said:
In a way, this question is trickier than it looks
I would argue that this is the entire point of the question...
 
  • Like
Likes Poetria
  • #15
Ray Vickson said:
In a way, this question is trickier than it looks. For any finite ##N > n## the difference ##S_n(x) = \sum_{k=0}^N x^k - \sum_{k=n+1}^N x^k## is just ##1+x+x^2 + \cdots + x^n##, a finite polynomial that exists and makes sense for all ##x##. However, when we go to the limit ##N \to \infty##, the difference ##\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} x^k - \sum_{k=n+1}^{\infty} x^k## only makes sense when each of the sums converge, so only if ##|x| < 1##. On the other hand, we have##1+x+x^2 + \cdots + x^n = \sum_{k=0}^N x^k - \sum_{k=n+1}^N x^k## for ALL ##N > n##, so is true also in the limit! In other words ##\lim (\sum - \sum )## is always OK but ## (\lim \sum) - (\lim \sum) ## might not be.
Many thanks for great explanation. :) I spent a lot of time thinking about it. :) Now I see what I didn't get.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top