Additive Prime Numbers: Is There Anything Known About them?

Mooky
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
A positive integer is called an additive prime number if it is prime and the sum of its digits is also prime. For example, 11 and 83 are additive prime numbers. OEIS gives the sequence of additive primes the number http://oeis.org/A046704" for that info).

I've done many Google and MathSciNet searches and could find nothing whatsoever about these numbers. Are there infinitely many of them? What is their density within the primes? There are many questions that could be asked about these, but it appears no one cares. Why is that? Does anyone know anything at all about additive primes, or can offer a link to someone who does?

Thank you,
Mooky
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The main reason why few people are interested in additive primes is that the property is not preserved under a change of base ( e.g. decimal to binary). Whether there are infinitely many of them is an open problem.
 
Thank you, Eynstone. I've never thought of that. However, I didn't know that number theorists care much about change of bases when it comes to prime numbers.

There is a http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/05/100512172533.htm" that proves that the sum of digits of primes is evenly distributed (between odd and even, that is). That propery doesn't carry across bases, either. For example, 13 and 17 have the same digit sum parity in decimal, but 13=11012 (parity 1) whereas 17=100012 (parity 0).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top