Adiabatic approximation for joint probability distribution

nigels
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Hi group, I'm a theoretical ecologist with fairly adequate training in applied math (ODE, linear algebra, applied probability, some PDEs). In my current work, I've encountered the use of adiabatic approximation to a joint probability distribution of two ever-fluctuating spatial variables. A search on the web shows that this method is primarily found in quantum physics, a field I'm wholly ignorant of. Is there any document/textbook one would recommend that can explain the technique to me given my background? Of course, it'd also be fantastic if someone can clarify the concept for me themselves here on the board.

THANKS!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I speculate that you won't get a useful answer until you pose a specific problem.

The combination of the term "adiabatic" with "joint probability distribution" is so curious that I couldn't resist looking it up on the web. The simple explanation that I found ( http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...sg=AFQjCNGjHL56nLD-LA26oZ3ectFJFwCt0Q&cad=rja ) makes the technique sound disappointing. If you have a differential equation involving time with variables that vary quickly with time and some variables that only vary slowly with time, then treat the slow varying ones as constants, get the answer, put the time dependence back by making the slow varying variables functions of time again. Is that all it amounts to?
 
Hi Stephen,

What you provided is exactly the explanation I need! And yes, the technique makes sense in this case since the model is assuming one of the two spatial variables (movement of the animal) to be diffusive and the other one (territory border of said animal) subdiffusive. The link you've provided, albeit heavily quantum physicsy, is quite helpful in painting an intuitive picture of the effect of relative time scale on the solution. Thank you so much for the wonderful help! It has made a significant difference.

Cheers.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
94
Views
11K
Back
Top