Adiabatic process in statistical mechanics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of adiabatic processes in statistical mechanics, particularly focusing on the definitions and implications of adiabatic versus reversible processes. Participants explore the conditions under which entropy remains constant and the distinctions between different thermodynamic frameworks.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why a thermally isolated process that occurs sufficiently slowly is necessarily adiabatic, suggesting that an adiabatic process is defined by no change in the subsystem's entropy, while a reversible process is defined by no change in the total entropy of the system.
  • Another participant argues that for sufficiently slow processes, the system is at maximal entropy at all times, and with thermal and mass isolation, the entropy cannot change, only the total energy can change through work done on the system.
  • A different participant clarifies that adiabatic means no heat transfer, not necessarily no entropy change, and introduces terms like isentropic for processes with no entropy change. They provide examples of adiabatic processes that are not reversible, such as free expansion and Joule-Thompson expansion.
  • One participant rephrases their question to focus on why the entropy of the gas remains constant during a slow volume change, rather than the total entropy of the system and environment.
  • There is a query about whether classical thermodynamics or statistical thermodynamics should be used for explanations, with a preference expressed for statistical thermodynamics.
  • Another participant notes that the term "adiabatic" has different meanings across fields, including a specific definition in quantum mechanics where it relates to changes in a Hamiltonian and the preservation of entropy in mixed states.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definitions and implications of adiabatic and reversible processes, indicating that multiple competing interpretations exist. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise definitions and applications of these terms in different contexts.

Contextual Notes

There are references to varying definitions of adiabatic processes in different texts, such as those by Landau and Lifshitz, which may lead to confusion. The discussion also highlights the need for clarity in the use of terminology across different fields of study.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and professionals in physics, particularly those interested in thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, and the nuances of terminology in different scientific contexts.

Jamister
Messages
58
Reaction score
4
Why is a thermally isolated process that occurs sufficiently slow is necessarily adiabatic and not just reversible process ? Here I mean that the definition of adiabatic process is no change in the entropy of the subsystem, and a reversible process is define by no change of the total entropy of all the system . For example, gas in a box that its volume is changing slowly- the entropy of the gas is the box is constant if there is no heat flow.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In part the word "sufficiently" in "sufficiently slow[ly]" is defining the process as adiabatic, but the key point is, I believe, that for sufficiently slow processes the system is at maximal entropy at all times.

If you add thermal isolation (and mass isolation) then the presumption is that the entropy cannot change. What can change is total energy in the form of work done on the system. But since the system is thermally and substantively isolated the fact that the process is reversible with only zero entropy energy exchange in the form of work being done to or by the system, we must assume no entropy change.
 
orisomech said:
Here I mean that the definition of adiabatic process is no change in the entropy of the subsystem, and a reversible process is define by no change of the total entropy of all the system .
Hello, perhaps there is some confusion about these terms. Adiabatic means no heat is transferred to or from the subsystem and its surroundings. It does not say anything about the entropy change. The word for no entropy change is isentropic or reversible. A slowly carried out adiabatic expansion under pressure from a friction-less piston is approximately a reversible process (0 entropy change). However there are other forms of (approximately) adiabatic expansion that are not reversible. One of the notable ones is free expansion into a vacuum. Free expansion will tend to increase the entropy. Another irreversible adiabatic process is a gas/fluid escaping through a small opening which is called Joule-Thompson expansion or throttling. Joule-Thompson expansion has approximately constant enthalpy (isenthalpic).

Some of these processes may be approximately adiabatic because they happen fast - no long enough for significant amount of heat to be transferred to the container.

There are also processes which are reversible but not adiabatic, like reversible isothermal expansion.

Well, thermodynamics can be a difficult subject but I think this is accurate to my understanding.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrDu
Since in the book of Landau and Lifshitz they have different definitions, let me rephrase my question that I meant to ask:
Gas in a box that its volume is changing slowly enough- the entropy of the gas is the box is constant if there is no heat flow. What I ask is why is the entropy of the gas in the box is constant, and not just the total entropy of the box and the environment together.
 
Are we allowed to use classical thermodynamics to explain this, or does it have to be explained using statistical thermodynamics?
 
Chestermiller said:
Are we allowed to use classical thermodynamics to explain this, or does it have to be explained using statistical thermodynamics?
I prefer statistical thermodynamics
 
The point is that "adiabatic" has slightly different meanings in different fields: On a greek airport, it means "no passage". In phenomenological thermodynamics, specifically, it means no passage of heat.
But it is also used in quantum mechanics. There, an adiabatic change means a time dependent change of a hamiltonian ##H(t)## such, that if the system is initially in an eigenstate of ##H(0)##, it will be in the corresponding eigenstate of ##H(t)## at time t. Hence there is no passage between eigenstates. If the system is initially in a mixed state with density matrix P, the entropy of this density matrix will not change. So for an adiabatic quantum mechanical process, there will be no change of entropy. Therefore in statistical mechanics, you have to look out in which sense "adiabatic" is used anytime.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: MisterX and anorlunda

Similar threads

  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
10K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
6K