Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the concept of adiabatic processes in statistical mechanics, particularly focusing on the definitions and implications of adiabatic versus reversible processes. Participants explore the conditions under which entropy remains constant and the distinctions between different thermodynamic frameworks.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- One participant questions why a thermally isolated process that occurs sufficiently slowly is necessarily adiabatic, suggesting that an adiabatic process is defined by no change in the subsystem's entropy, while a reversible process is defined by no change in the total entropy of the system.
- Another participant argues that for sufficiently slow processes, the system is at maximal entropy at all times, and with thermal and mass isolation, the entropy cannot change, only the total energy can change through work done on the system.
- A different participant clarifies that adiabatic means no heat transfer, not necessarily no entropy change, and introduces terms like isentropic for processes with no entropy change. They provide examples of adiabatic processes that are not reversible, such as free expansion and Joule-Thompson expansion.
- One participant rephrases their question to focus on why the entropy of the gas remains constant during a slow volume change, rather than the total entropy of the system and environment.
- There is a query about whether classical thermodynamics or statistical thermodynamics should be used for explanations, with a preference expressed for statistical thermodynamics.
- Another participant notes that the term "adiabatic" has different meanings across fields, including a specific definition in quantum mechanics where it relates to changes in a Hamiltonian and the preservation of entropy in mixed states.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the definitions and implications of adiabatic and reversible processes, indicating that multiple competing interpretations exist. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise definitions and applications of these terms in different contexts.
Contextual Notes
There are references to varying definitions of adiabatic processes in different texts, such as those by Landau and Lifshitz, which may lead to confusion. The discussion also highlights the need for clarity in the use of terminology across different fields of study.
Who May Find This Useful
This discussion may be useful for students and professionals in physics, particularly those interested in thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, and the nuances of terminology in different scientific contexts.