Adjoint of a Differential Operator

CoachZ
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
If the inner product is defined on V with dimension less than or equal to 3 as \left\langle f,g \right\rangle = \int_{0}^{1}f(x)g(x)dx, I'm trying to find D* such that \left\langle Df,g \right\rangle = \left\langle f,D*g \right\rangle, and I thought I had a closed form of D*. If {1, x, (x^2)/2, (x^3)/3}. Call each element e_i, i = 0,...,3 form a basis for V, then \left\langle Df,g \right\rangle = \left\langle f,D*g \right\rangle holds given D* is defined as i times the (derivative of g(x)) if g(x) has degree greater than 0, but I can't think of a closed form so that it will work for all elements. Does anyone have any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would \delta(x-1)-\delta(x)-D work?

\int_0^1 Df(x) g(x)dx = \int_0^1 (df(x)/dx) g(x)dx = f(x) g(x) |^1_0 - \int^1_0 f(x) Dg(x) dx = \int^1_0 f(x) [(\delta(x-1)-\delta(x)) - D]g(x) dx
 
CoachZ said:
If the inner product is defined on V with dimension less than or equal to 3 as \left\langle f,g \right\rangle = \int_{0}^{1}f(x)g(x)dx, I'm trying to find D* such that \left\langle Df,g \right\rangle = \left\langle f,D*g \right\rangle, and I thought I had a closed form of D*. If {1, x, (x^2)/2, (x^3)/3}. Call each element e_i, i = 0,...,3 form a basis for V, then \left\langle Df,g \right\rangle = \left\langle f,D*g \right\rangle holds given D* is defined as i times the (derivative of g(x)) if g(x) has degree greater than 0, but I can't think of a closed form so that it will work for all elements. Does anyone have any suggestions?
? Please be careful to tell us exactly what you are doing! You start by talking about a vector space "V with dimension less than or equal to 3" but then start integrating? A vector space, of any dimension, does not necessarily contain functions at all. "A vector space with dimension less than or equal to 3" is NOT the same as "polynomials of degree 3 or less". (In fact, the space of polynomials of degree 3 or less has dimension four, not three, as you make clear by giving a basis consisting of four functions.)

In any case, what D* is such that <Du, v>= <u, D*v> depends upon what D is! Do you mean that D is the derivative operator?
 
HallsofIvy said:
? Please be careful to tell us exactly what you are doing! You start by talking about a vector space "V with dimension less than or equal to 3" but then start integrating? A vector space, of any dimension, does not necessarily contain functions at all. "A vector space with dimension less than or equal to 3" is NOT the same as "polynomials of degree 3 or less". (In fact, the space of polynomials of degree 3 or less has dimension four, not three, as you make clear by giving a basis consisting of four functions.)

In any case, what D* is such that <Du, v>= <u, D*v> depends upon what D is! Do you mean that D is the derivative operator?

Exactly: D is the derivative operator and I'm trying to find D*, which is simply the adjoint operator. I apologize for writing it so messily. I'm a first year graduate student still working on my writing skills, so if you have any suggestions, either for finding D* or improving writing skills, it would be greatly appreciated.
 
Figured this out. Since every operator takes one some matrix representation, and we consider the orthonormal basis with respect to the differentiation operator, we can extend that basis to matrix form. But there's a theorem that states the matrix representation of D* is simply the transpose of the matrix represented by D. Therefore, I'm all set. Thanks for the suggestions!
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top