Adjoint of the Inverse: Proving [adj(A)]^{-1} = adj(A^{-1})

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rijad Hadzic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the relationship between the adjoint of a matrix and the adjoint of its inverse, specifically the equation [adj(A)]^{-1} = adj(A^{-1}). The subject area is linear algebra, focusing on properties of matrices and determinants.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the adjoint and the inverse of a matrix, questioning the implications of the determinant values in the proof. There is also a consideration of the definition of the adjoint matrix and its application to the case of the inverse.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with some participants expressing uncertainty about the conditions necessary for the proof. One participant indicates a desire to pause the thread for further reflection, while another raises a question regarding the definition of the adjoint in relation to the matrices involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted concern regarding the assumption that the determinants of the matrices involved are equal to 1, which is not specified in the problem statement. This raises questions about the generality of the proof being attempted.

Rijad Hadzic
Messages
321
Reaction score
20

Homework Statement


Prove that [adj(A)]^{-1} = adj(A^{-1})

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok. So if

1/det(a) * adj(a) = A^{-1} is true,

then adj(A) = A^{-1} det(A)

then

[adj(A)]^{-1} = 1/det(A^{-1}) * adj(A^{-1}) * det(A)

now the statement would be proved if det(A) and det(A^{-1}) were both = 1, but it doesn't say that's the case in the problem. How would I go about completing this?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok hold on a sec guys. I've been relying on the help of others a bit too much. I'm going to mark the thread as solved and then open it again if I truly can't figure it out.
 
If we take ##\operatorname{adj}(B) = B^{-1} \cdot \det(B)## as defining equation for the adjoint matrix, what does this mean for ##B=A^{-1}## and how does it relate to the case ##B=A\,##?
 
Rijad, for future reference, in TeX expressions if the exponent is more than one character, you have to have braces -- { } -- around the expression. I have fixed your first post.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K