Adjusting Air Column Length with Water: Why No Waves?

AI Thread Summary
In air column experiments, water is used to adjust the air column length, but most sound waves reflect back into the air rather than passing into the water. While some sound energy is absorbed by the water, the majority is reflected due to the impedance difference between air and water. The open end of the air column loses more energy than the closed end, which affects the formation of standing waves. Sound waves inherently lose energy through various processes, including dispersion and heat. Maintaining standing waves requires a continuous input of energy to compensate for these losses.
atavistic
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
In many problems , to change the length of the air column we use water but I don't understand why waves don't pass into water and then the reflected wave will have less amplitude and hence standing waves could not be formed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Waves tend to reflect off any interfaces between media, because the different media have a different "impedance." In this situation, you can think get away with thinking of impedance as simple resistance -- water is much harder to shake than is air.

- Warren
 
Ye, but water will absorb also right?
 
Yes, some of the sound will enter the water. If you're swimming underwater and a bomb goes off in the air above, you'll hear it! :smile:

But most of the sound is reflected back into the air.

In air column experiments like you describe, much more energy is lost at the open end of the column than at the closed (water) end. After all, some of the sound has to come out the open end so we can hear it.
 
By the way I believe that there are no waves existing that reflect of an object without loosing any energy, particularly with soundwaves which loose their energy to the traverse wave, and to dispersion and heat. The standing wave induced by boundaries can only be maintained by continuously providing amplitude to the insident wave, so the loss can be overcome.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top