Certainly an easy question for you (specialists on this forum) but absolutely not clear for me.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The ADM Approach (1 + 3), as it can be seen in Misner Thorne and Wheeler or some other reference, is based on a kind of extension of the Pythagorras Theorem to a Minkowki space. Ok.

Its signature is (- +++); convention, I suppose; ok.

And then you can see in some equations resulting of this approach a (3-3) matrix supposed to represent the local 3D metric tensor as if it could have any value and not obligatory the unit matrix I(3) which is the spatial part of the (4-4) one associated to a Lorentz metric.

Why? Does it come from the manner to "cut" the slice of time? I am sure something is not ok in my head concerning this point. Thanks for help.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# ADM Approach

Loading...

Similar Threads for Approach | Date |
---|---|

I Ohanian approach to GR | Jan 19, 2018 |

I What does Alice observe as she approaches an Event horizon? | Dec 24, 2017 |

I Can a cosmologist cross an event horizon? | May 31, 2017 |

A How these notions relate to the usual SR approach? | Mar 13, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**