Advanced Arithmetic: Find Min Digits for Fraction Decimal

  • Thread starter Thread starter Michele Nunes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    advanced Arithmetic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the minimum number of decimal digits needed to express a fraction. Participants analyze the process of dividing the numerator by 2 repeatedly, noting that each division introduces an additional decimal place. The consensus emerges that dividing 1 by 222 yields 22 decimal places, while dividing 123456788 by 104 contributes 4 more, totaling 26 digits. Clarifications are made regarding the mathematical principles of division and the handling of odd and even numbers in this context. Overall, the solution concludes that the minimum number of digits required is 26.
Michele Nunes
Messages
42
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


What is the minimum number of digits to the right of the decimal point needed to express the fraction
abee710ba93bd9619bd3e0d2821d027f0278f31c.png
as a decimal?
a) 4
b) 22
c) 26
d) 30
e) 104

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


One possible solution is: "We can rewrite the fraction as
b6d710910e5aafbc58b027e85340bedc12d33e5e.png
. Since the last digit of the numerator is odd, a
79069377f91364c2f87a64e5f9f562a091c8a6c1.png
is added to the right if the numerator is divided by [PLAIN]https://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/1/c/41c544263a265ff15498ee45f7392c5f86c6d151.png, and this will continuously happen because [PLAIN]https://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/9/0/79069377f91364c2f87a64e5f9f562a091c8a6c1.png, itself, is odd. Indeed, this happens twenty-two times since we divide by https://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/1/c/41c544263a265ff15498ee45f7392c5f86c6d151.png twenty-two times, so we will need
1d111a5e00ee5ea6700bb629994dc629874c505b.png
more digits. Hence, the answer is [PLAIN]https://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/9/7/897cab64b41a26c4bf59f579a975ec600cf2441b.png."

So I understand how they rewrote the fraction, however I'm totally lost by everything after that. I'm not exactly sure why a 5 is added to the right if the numerator is divided by 2 and how that has anything to do with the last digit being odd. Also, a calculator is not allowed on this. If someone could either clarify the explanation given or give a more simplified alternate solution, that would be appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it is a bit more clear if you do the division by 104 at the end.

123456789=123456788 + 1. Divide it by 2 : it becomes an integer + 0.5 that means one decimal.
Divide that number by 2 gain, you get an integer, + 0.25, so you have two decimals. Do again: it is something + 0.125. Repeat: the number of decimals increases by one at every division by 2. The first term becomes odd after some divisions, but that will have less decimals than the division of 1.
So how many decimals are there if you divide by 222 (that is, you do 22 divisions) ?
 
ehild said:
I think it is a bit more clear if you do the division by 104 at the end.

123456789=123456788 + 1. Divide it by 2 : it becomes an integer + 0.5 that means one decimal.
Divide that number by 2 gain, you get an integer, + 0.25, so you have two decimals. Do again: it is something + 0.125. Repeat: the number of decimals increases by one at every division by 2. The first term becomes odd after some divisions, but that will have less decimals than the division of 1.
So how many decimals are there if you divide by 222 (that is, you do 22 divisions) ?
Okay I'm kind of making sense out of it. If you divide 1 by 222 then you will have 22 decimals, and then if you divide 123456788 by 104 then you will have 4 decimals, and 22 + 4 = 26, I don't know though something about that process seems off, I feel like you can't just separate them like that, can you?
 
Is 123456789 = 123456788 +1?
Is (a+b)/2 = a/2 + b/2 true?
try with a smaller number : How many decimals are there in 9/23?
 
ehild said:
Is 123456789 = 123456788 +1?
Is (a+b)/2 = a/2 + b/2 true?
Yes, but I would have 123456788/(222 * 104) + 1/(222 * 104)
and if I ONLY divided 123456788 by 104, then where did the 222 in the denominator go
and if I ONLY divided 1 by 222, then where did the 104 in the denominator go, do you see what I mean?
 
Michele Nunes said:
Yes, but I would have 123456788/(222 * 104) + 1/(222 * 104)
and if I ONLY divided 123456788 by 104, then where did the 222 in the denominator go
and if I ONLY divided 1 by 222, then where did the 104 in the denominator go, do you see what I mean?
##\frac {A}{b c}= \frac {A/b}{c} ##. If you have a product of two numbers in the denominator, you can divide by one number, then you divide the result by the other.
Here, you divide by 222 first, then you divide the result by 104.
If you evaluate ##\frac{36}{3*4}## you can do it by dividing 36 with 12 or first dividing 36 by 3 (you get 12) then dividing 12 by 4 - the result is 3 with both methods.
 
  • Like
Likes Michele Nunes
Do you understand it now?
 
ehild said:
Do you understand it now?
Yes for the most part, thank you!
 
Back
Top