[I invite people to post links as responses in case the idea I'm putting forward is already covered someplace that I missed.] Something has been bothering me about this type of experiment for a long time, but this is clearly the place to bring it up. My problem is this: that in an EPR-type experiment, one simply cannot say that one of the measurements took place before the other. Ever. So it is simply NOT true that one measurement forces the other into a known state. Of course we *can* wait at B for the A-B order to become unambiguous but this is exactly the uninteresting case in EPR. It's always the interesting case when the two measurements are not in one another's light cone. I advance the idea that the correlation must take place and therefore that the macroscopic A measurement outcome is actually entangled with the corresponding macroscopic B measurement on the other side. In other words, widely seperated quantum engangled measurements are in fact macroscopically entangled. Comments?