Advice on being mathematically prepared (QM Griffiths and Cosmology Ryden)

AI Thread Summary
To prepare for Griffiths and Ryden, a solid understanding of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) and partial differential equations (PDEs) is beneficial, but not excessively demanding. For Griffiths, familiarity with Fourier transforms and the method of separation of variables is essential, while deeper knowledge of systems of differential equations or change of variables is not required. The appendices in Griffiths cover necessary mathematical concepts, and the text is noted for its clear explanations of derivations. Algebra proficiency and integral skills are crucial for problem-solving. Ryden requires knowledge of differential equations and integrals, with some integrals potentially needing numerical methods for solutions. Overall, both texts are considered approachable for students, with Griffiths being less linear algebra-intensive compared to other graduate-level materials.
JVanUW
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I was wondering whether I should brush up on ode's/pde's or just go through the math
appendix of Griffiths to prepare myself. How much ode's/pde's is needed for Griffiths
and Ryden? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends on how familiar you are with certain kinds of math :)

We didn't use Griffiths, but I've looked into it a couple of times and it didn't look too heavy on the math. Hilbert spaces are important in QM, but I'm pretty sure Griffiths won't expect you to know it already.

Things you definitely need to control are Fourier transforms and solving differential equations by separation of variables, but that doesn't seem like a whole lot. Take a look at the appendices: Fourier transforms will undoubedly be covered there, and as for solving differential equations by separation: well the name already pretty much says what there is to say, assuming you've seen it in a course before.

My feeling is that you can dive right in.

As for Ryden, no idea, unfamiliar with it.
 
I cannot speak for Ryden, but, as I recall, Griffiths is not too demanding in terms of pde's. Sure, brush up on ode's, as you'll need them for the exercises, but nothing too demanding. Griffith's is very good at explaining the derivations, so you needn't worry too much.
 
Awesome, thanks. So no systems of differential equations or change of variables?
 
For Griffiths: If you want to follow all the derivations then you definitely need to have a good knowledge of ODE's, Separation of Variables in PDE's, Fourier Series and Transforms. To do the problems you just need to be a beast at algebra and doing integrals and have a lot of patience :)

Griffiths isn't linear algebra heavy at all (this makes things boring IMO), unlike most of the graduate level texts.
 
Speaking for Ryden, you basically need to know how to solve some differential equations, integrals (some of which will be tough or require numerical methods), and perhaps a little familiarity with 4D metric.
 
I appreciate all the insight. What do you mean by numerical methods?
 
Techniques for solving integrals without analytical solutions. The ability to use Wolphram Alpha will probably suffice. I remember the big things were all the integrals and differential equations. The book is well written though as well as Griffiths QM which I am using currently. They are both rather friendly books.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top