Advice on being mathematically prepared (QM Griffiths and Cosmology Ryden)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical preparation needed for studying quantum mechanics using Griffiths and cosmology using Ryden. Participants explore the necessary mathematical concepts, including ordinary differential equations (ODEs), partial differential equations (PDEs), Fourier transforms, and numerical methods, as well as the overall mathematical rigor of the texts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the necessity of brushing up on ODEs/PDEs versus reviewing the math appendix of Griffiths.
  • Another participant suggests that Griffiths is not overly demanding in terms of mathematics, emphasizing the importance of Fourier transforms and solving differential equations by separation of variables.
  • A different participant agrees that while ODEs are important for exercises, Griffiths provides clear explanations of derivations, suggesting a moderate level of mathematical preparation is sufficient.
  • Questions arise regarding the need for systems of differential equations or change of variables in Griffiths.
  • One participant asserts that a solid understanding of ODEs, separation of variables in PDEs, and Fourier series and transforms is essential for following derivations in Griffiths, while algebra and integral skills are also necessary for problem-solving.
  • Regarding Ryden, a participant notes that knowledge of solving differential equations, integrals (some potentially requiring numerical methods), and familiarity with 4D metrics is needed.
  • A participant seeks clarification on what is meant by numerical methods.
  • Another participant explains that numerical methods refer to techniques for solving integrals without analytical solutions, suggesting that tools like Wolfram Alpha may be sufficient for the tasks required in both texts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that a solid foundation in ODEs and some familiarity with Fourier transforms is important for Griffiths, while opinions on the mathematical demands of Ryden vary, with less consensus on the specifics required.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the exact mathematical requirements for Ryden, and there are varying opinions on the level of difficulty associated with Griffiths, particularly regarding the use of linear algebra and systems of differential equations.

JVanUW
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I was wondering whether I should brush up on ode's/pde's or just go through the math
appendix of Griffiths to prepare myself. How much ode's/pde's is needed for Griffiths
and Ryden? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends on how familiar you are with certain kinds of math :)

We didn't use Griffiths, but I've looked into it a couple of times and it didn't look too heavy on the math. Hilbert spaces are important in QM, but I'm pretty sure Griffiths won't expect you to know it already.

Things you definitely need to control are Fourier transforms and solving differential equations by separation of variables, but that doesn't seem like a whole lot. Take a look at the appendices: Fourier transforms will undoubedly be covered there, and as for solving differential equations by separation: well the name already pretty much says what there is to say, assuming you've seen it in a course before.

My feeling is that you can dive right in.

As for Ryden, no idea, unfamiliar with it.
 
I cannot speak for Ryden, but, as I recall, Griffiths is not too demanding in terms of pde's. Sure, brush up on ode's, as you'll need them for the exercises, but nothing too demanding. Griffith's is very good at explaining the derivations, so you needn't worry too much.
 
Awesome, thanks. So no systems of differential equations or change of variables?
 
For Griffiths: If you want to follow all the derivations then you definitely need to have a good knowledge of ODE's, Separation of Variables in PDE's, Fourier Series and Transforms. To do the problems you just need to be a beast at algebra and doing integrals and have a lot of patience :)

Griffiths isn't linear algebra heavy at all (this makes things boring IMO), unlike most of the graduate level texts.
 
Speaking for Ryden, you basically need to know how to solve some differential equations, integrals (some of which will be tough or require numerical methods), and perhaps a little familiarity with 4D metric.
 
I appreciate all the insight. What do you mean by numerical methods?
 
Techniques for solving integrals without analytical solutions. The ability to use Wolphram Alpha will probably suffice. I remember the big things were all the integrals and differential equations. The book is well written though as well as Griffiths QM which I am using currently. They are both rather friendly books.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K