Advice on geometric calculations

kirk
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, any advice out there on an interesting challenge (at least a challenge for me :-)?

I am trying to come up with the easiest way to calculate the shortest distance between a single point and an arbitrary line. I want to start with lattitude and longitude coordinates for single point and for the endpoints of line segment.

It is a straightforward calculation to get the distance from the single point to the end points of the line segment using the lat/long.

But sometimes the shortest distance will be a perpendicular path to the line segment. I'm rusty on my geometry and not seeing the simple way of doing the calculations. is the answer just in rotation and translation of coordinates?

Any advice or tips out there?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If the line is Ax + By + C = 0 and the point is (m, n) then the distance is:

d = |\frac{Am + Bn + C}{\sqrt{A^2 + B^2}}|

Or are you talking about a different method?
 
"It is a straightforward calculation to get the distance from the single point to the end points of the line segment using the lat/long."

lat/long? Are you talking about the distance from a point on a sphere to a great circle?

"But sometimes the shortest distance will be a perpendicular path to the line segment."
I would have thought it was always on a perpendicular path!
 
IF the line has end points there may not be a perpendicular that passes through the point off the line.
 
clarifications

good clarification questions.

yes, HallsofIvy, for the distance between two points, I was talking about great circles. I have used some formulas I found to get the distance between the two points using lattitude and longitude measures.

My concern is the shortest distance between the single A point and any point on the line segment BC.

As Matt points out, because of the end points of the line segment, there is not always a perpendicular. However, in that case, I will just use the great circles formula to get the distance to the nearest end point.

My big problem is thinking through how to calculate the distance from A to the randomly specified line segment BC when starting with the lattitude and longitude coordinates. Since the BC can have any orientation, I'm still struggling with a way to set up the formulas.

Thanks folks!
 
My big problem with the situation when there is a perpendicular. How do I calculate the distance from A to the randomly specified line segment BC when starting with the lattitude and longitude coordinates? Since the BC can have any orientation, I'm still struggling with a way to set up the formulas.

I'm trying to think through rotations and translation of coordinates because it seems to just like dropping a perpendicular from above an axis, but I'm too rusty with it. And then doing it starting with lattitude and longitude.


thanks!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top