Affine Algebraic Curves - Kunz - Definition 1.1

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around Ernst Kunz's Definition 1.1 in his book "Introduction to Plane Algebraic Curves," specifically focusing on the interpretation of polynomials with coefficients from a subring and the nature of the variables involved. Participants explore the implications of using indeterminate variables and the evaluation of these variables in different contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Peter questions whether the values of the indeterminate variables $$X$$ and $$Y$$ in the polynomial $$f \in K_0[X,Y]$$ come from the subring $$K_0$$ or the larger ring $$K$$.
  • Some participants clarify that $$X$$ and $$Y$$ are indeterminate variables, and elements of $$K_0[X,Y]$$ are polynomials with coefficients from $$K_0$$, which is a subset of $$K$$.
  • Peter expresses confusion regarding Kunz's examples where he appears to evaluate $$X$$ and $$Y$$ in $$K_0$$, specifically in the context of plotting zero sets of polynomials.
  • Another participant notes that the graphs shown are traces of $$\mathbb{R}$$-rational points, indicating that the zero set of the polynomial is intersected with $$\mathbb{R}^2$$ to obtain plots.
  • Peter suggests that it might also be possible to graph the zero set using $$\mathbb{C}$$-rational points if $$K_0$$ and $$K$$ are both taken as $$\mathbb{C}$$.
  • A later reply confirms Peter's understanding of the concept, indicating agreement with his reasoning.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the nature of $$X$$ and $$Y$$ as indeterminate variables and the interpretation of plotting zero sets. However, there is some ambiguity regarding the evaluation of these variables in different contexts, particularly in relation to Kunz's examples.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the dependence on the definitions of the rings involved and the interpretation of polynomial evaluations, which may not be fully resolved in the context of Kunz's examples.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Ernst Kunz book, "Introduction to Plane Algebraic Curves"

I need help with some aspects of Kunz' Definition 1.1.

The relevant text from Kunz' book is as follows:View attachment 4556In the above text, Kunz writes the following:

" ... ... If $$K_0 \subset K$$ is a subring and $$\Gamma = \mathscr{V} (f)$$ for a nonconstant polynomial $$f \in K_0 [X,Y]$$ ... ..."


My question is as follows:

Given $$f \in K_0 [X,Y]$$ means that the co-efficients of $$f$$ come from $$K_0$$ ... so if

$$f = aX + bY + c $$

then $$a,b,c$$ come from $$K_0$$ ... that is $$a,b,c \in K_0$$ ... ...

... BUT ... from where do we take the values of $$X$$ and $$Y$$ ... do they likewise come from $$K_0$$ ... or do they come from $$K$$ ...

Hope someone can help clarify this issue ...

Peter
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Note $X$ and $Y$ are indeterminate variables. Elements of $K_0[X,Y]$ are polynomials in $X$ and $Y$ with coefficients in $K_0$. Since $K_0$ is a subset of $K$, the coefficients must belong to $K$.
 
Euge said:
Note $X$ and $Y$ are indeterminate variables. Elements of $K_0[X,Y]$ are polynomials in $X$ and $Y$ with coefficients in $K_0$. Since $K_0$ is a subset of $K$, the coefficients must belong to $K$.
Thanks for your help Euge ...

Yes, I understand that $X$ and $Y$ are indeterminate variables, ... ... but then Kunz, in the examples following Definition 1.1, plots the zero sets i.e. 'plots' and displays $$f = 0$$ for a few curves, apparently taking values of $$X,Y$$ in $$K_0$$ ... but maybe you would say evaluating the points in $$K_0$$ ... ...

For example, see Example 1.2 (d) below where Kunz appears to take values of $$X, Y$$ in $$K_0 = \mathbb{R}$$ ... (indeed, slightly confusingly in a subset $$\mathbb{R} \subset \mathbb{R}_+$$ ... ... as follows:
View attachment 4557
Can you explain how one should view/understand these "plots" where $$X,Y$$ take values in $$K_0$$ ...

Peter
 
But wait, these graphs you've shown are traces of $\Bbb R$-rational points -- you take the zero set of the polynomial and intersect it with $\Bbb R^2$. So we substitute real values of $X$ and $Y$ to obtain the plots.
 
Euge said:
But wait, these graphs you've shown are traces of $\Bbb R$-rational points -- you take the zero set of the polynomial and intersect it with $\Bbb R^2$. So we substitute real values of $X$ and $Y$ to obtain the plots.
Thanks Euge ... most helpful ...

And presumably, we could graph the trace of the zero set anyway ... essentially graphing the $$\mathbb{C}$$-rational points ... that is take $$K_0 = K = \mathbb{C}$$ ... (if we had 4 dimensions to hand ... :) ...)

Is that right?

Peter
 
You've got the idea. ;)
 
Peter said:
Thanks Euge ... most helpful ...

And presumably, we could graph the trace of the zero set anyway ... essentially graphing the $$\mathbb{C}$$-rational points ... that is take $$K_0 = K = \mathbb{C}$$ ... (if we had 4 dimensions to hand ... :) ...)

Is that right?

Peter
Thanks for for all your help in this matter, Euge ...

Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K