Afraid to Manipulate Complex Numbers

AI Thread Summary
Manipulating complex numbers can be daunting due to the differences from real numbers, particularly with operations like square roots and exponentiation. Common misconceptions include the incorrect assumption that \sqrt{-1}\sqrt{-1} equals \sqrt{(-1)(-1)}, highlighting the need for caution. While certain properties, such as (a^x)^y = a^{xy}, do not universally hold, understanding when they apply is crucial. The discussion emphasizes the importance of relying on definitions, particularly the relationship between exponentials and logarithms, to navigate these complexities. Familiarity with the behavior of the complex logarithm can help clarify these operations and reduce confusion.
nonequilibrium
Messages
1,412
Reaction score
2
Hello. I'm currently following a course in Complex Analysis, but I'm often afraid of manipulating certain expressions. It is well known that certain "intuitively obvious" actions which are true for real numbers are not true for complex numbers, a simple one being \sqrt{-1}\sqrt{-1} \neq \sqrt {(-1)(-1)} and many others; there are quite some sites that warn you for these traps, but I can't seem to find any site which then tells me what is allowed. For example, instead of just saying "\sqrt{a}\sqrt{b} does not necessarily equal \sqrt{ab}", I'd also like the site to say "but what stays true is that \sqrt{a}\sqrt{b} = \pm \sqrt{ab}". For example, something I'm wondering about: I know (a^x)^y = a^{xy} is not generally true anymore, but in what cases can I still do it anyway?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's hard to memorize what you can and can't do like that, so instead just remember definitions, definitions, definitions! x^y = \exp \left( y \log x \right)

a^{xy} = \exp \left( xy \log a \right)
(a^x)^y = \left( \exp \left(x \log a \right) \right)^y = \exp \left( y \log \left( \exp \left(x \log a \right) \right) \right).

So the 2nd matches the first if we address whether \log (\exp z) = z where z = x \log a. The subtleties of the complex logarithim and how it behaves with the exponential function is described very here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_logarithm . Using the definitions we can always reduce problems like the one here to one of the basic questions about complex logs, which that article informs you about.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top