After the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima, people still live there.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nusc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nuclear
Nusc
Messages
752
Reaction score
2
After the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima, people still live there.

How long does it take for the radiation to go away?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


How long before the started to inhabit the area?
 


Straight away, radiation is really the least of your problems if somebody detonates a bomb above your head.
Only about 10-15% of the initial casualties were due to radiation and long term very few - something like a few hundred excess cancer deaths over the last 50years.

Basically everybody close enough to receive a dangerous radiation dose are killed by the blast or it's immediate results.
 


Nusc said:
After the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima, people still live there.

How long does it take for the radiation to go away?

That is a legitimate question.
 


The most dangerous isotope from a Hiroshima type bomb is probably Iodine 131 with a half life of 8days, so after a couple of months it is essentially zero.
Ceasium 137 with a half life of 30years is also produced but it's not very easily absorbed in the body.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
6K
Back
Top