Agree or Disagree? Analyzing Wave Amplitudes

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 731016
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amplitudes Wave
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of wave amplitudes in the context of constructive interference and standing waves. The first statement refers to the initial amplitude of traveling waves, denoted as A_i, which leads to antinodes with an amplitude of 2A and nodes at 0. The second statement addresses the resultant amplitude of the standing wave, represented as A_f = 2A_i. Participants agree that both references to amplitude should be understood as 2A, clarifying the apparent contradiction. This analysis emphasizes the importance of context in understanding wave behavior.
member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For this,
1682629098130.png


The two statements highlighted do not seem to agree. I think the first statement highlighted is referring to A as initial amplitude (which we can denote ##A_i##) of the traveling waves before there constructive interference to form antinodes with an amplitude 2A and nodes of an amplitude 0. Where I think the second highlighted statement is referring to when A is the resultant amplitude of standing wave which we can denote ##A_f = 2A_i##.

Is my understanding please correct?

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ChiralSuperfields said:
The two statements highlighted do not seem to agree. I think the first statement highlighted is referring to A as initial amplitude (which we can denote ##A_i##) of the traveling waves before there constructive interference to form antinodes with an amplitude 2A and nodes of an amplitude 0. Where I think the second highlighted statement is referring to when A is the resultant amplitude of standing wave which we can denote ##A_f = 2A_i##.

Is my understanding please correct?

Many thanks!
I believe you are right. There is also the very first sentence of that extract, which also says ##\pm A##. I assume A is defined in some preceding text, so both the A references should be 2A.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
haruspex said:
I believe you are right. There is also the very first sentence of that extract, which also says ##\pm A##. I assume A is defined in some preceding text, so both the A references should be 2A.
Great, thank you for your help @haruspex!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top