Algebra II: Direct/Inverse Variation & Translation Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter gcn_zelda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra
gcn_zelda
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I have a test Friday, and there are a few things that I don't understand. Here are a few examples so you know the context

1. Direct/Inverse Variation - Identify as Direct or Inverse Variation
A. x|-2| 4| 6|
y| 4|-8|-12|

B. x| -2|-1| 3|
y|-1/2|-1|1/3|

2. Translation - Write an equation for the translation of y=2/x with the give asymptotes
x = 2; y = 3


Could somebody explain these to me?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The goal of the first question is to identify the relationship between the given x and y values. For the first one you have

y = -2x

Can you see the relationship in the second set of numbers?

Sorry, no time for the 2nd question now.
 
I saw the relationship between the numbers, but how do I know whether it's Direct Variation or Inverse Variation?
 
A direct relationship is defined by y = kx where k is a constant and an inverse relationship is y = k/x.

Does that help? :smile:
 
Originally posted by gcn_zelda
I saw the relationship between the numbers, but how do I know whether it's Direct Variation or Inverse Variation?

It helps a heckuva lot to know what Direct Variation and Inverse Variation mean! It would be a good idea to actually right down the definitions while you are doing these problems.

In x|-2| 4| 6|
y| 4|-8|-12|

I see that when x changes from -2 to 4 (x is multiplied by -2) y changes from 4 to -8: y is also multiplied by -2. As confirmation, when x changes from -2 to 6 (multiplied by -3), y changes from 4 to -12: also multiplied by -3. x and y change in the same way: "direct" variation

For the second problem,
x| -2 |-1| 3 |
y|-1/2|-1|1/3|

I see that when x changes from -2 to -1 (x is multiplied by 1/2), y changes from -1/2 to -1 (y is multiplied by 2: 1 over (1/2)). As confirmation, I see that when x changes from -1 to 3 (x is multiplied by -3), y changes from -1 to 1/3 (y is multiplied by -1/3). In each case y is multiplied by the reciprocal or "inverse" of the number x is multiplied by. That is "inverse" variation.

y= 2/x has vertical asymptote x= 0 for x very close to 0, the fraction "blows up". It has horizontal asymptote y= 0 since for x very large (positive or negative) y will be very close to 0. (Those are thing you would be expected to know before doing a problem like this.)

You want to "translate" the function y= 2/x so that it will have asymptotes x= 2 and y= 3. You "translate" a graph by adding or subtracting a number to or from x and y. To translate right or left (move the vertical asymptote from x= 0 to x= 2) add or subtract something from x. Specifically, you want something like y= 2/(x-a). Remember that x=0 was an asymptote of y= 2/x because that made the denominator 0. What value of a makes the denominator of y= 2/(x-a) equal to 0?
To move the horizontal asyptote from y= 0 to y= 3 add or subtract something from the y value: You now have y= 2/(x-a) (you found the correct value of a above) and y still will be close to 0 for x very large. What value of b makes y= 2/(x-a)+ b equal to 3 when x is very large?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
4K
Back
Top