Algebra solution containing trig?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nebuchadnezza
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Trig
Nebuchadnezza
Messages
78
Reaction score
2
I was calculating some numbers, revolving around a sphere and some integration.

The case was to find out for what x-value a spherical bowl with a radius of 5m was half filled.

After doing the algebra, I narrowed it down to

x^3 - 15x^2 + 125 = 0

Now, my calculator says that the solution to this equation is.

x = 5 \sqrt{3}\sin\left(\frac{\pi }{9} \right) -5 \cos\left( \frac{\pi }{9} \right) +5

How do you figure that out? Kept trying a few variable changes, but nothing comes to mind.

Ofcourse this polynomial have more solutions, but this is the only solution where 0<x<5 the other ones where -2.2 and 14.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
where is x? where is the origin? If it was me, I would have placed the origin in the center of the sphere and then for x=0, the sphere should be half full?
 
Try this article:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubic_function

There is a section on the trigonometric method for the solution of a cubic eq. toward the bottom of the article.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top