What Are the Key Differences Between Algebra 1 and Algebra 2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shawn Garsed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Algebra 2
AI Thread Summary
Algebra 1 and Algebra 2 are course titles assigned by specific schools rather than distinct fields of mathematics. The discussions indicate that Algebra 2 often revisits material from Algebra 1, suggesting that it serves as a second attempt to teach foundational concepts. The content overlap can lead to confusion for self-learners, as many find little new information in Algebra 2 textbooks. It is generally acceptable to skip familiar topics in self-study, but a brief review may be beneficial. Understanding the course structure and content can help learners navigate their studies more effectively.
Shawn Garsed
Messages
50
Reaction score
1
Hi everybody,

I wanted to know what the difference is between algebra 1 and 2.
The reason I'm asking is because I'm teaching myself mathematics and at moment I'm studying algebra 2 using study books. However, it seems that a lot of the material is a repeat of algebra 1.

Greetings,

Shawn
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You need to understand that "Algebra 1" and "Algebra 2" and not "fields of mathematics", they are names assigned to courses by specific schools. No one can tell you what is the difference between two specific courses except people at the specific school at which they are offered.
 
Shawn Garsed said:
Hi everybody,

I wanted to know what the difference is between algebra 1 and 2.

Shawn

Algebra 2 is the second attempt of the school system to teach you the material they should have taught properly in Algebra 1. They usually do this under the pretext that the student is not bright enough to absorb all of basic algebra in one year. It's easy to see through the deception, because, as you've noted, the material covered is not all that different.

OK, I'm being a little disingenuous, but I'm not too far off the mark.
 
HallsofIvy said:
You need to understand that "Algebra 1" and "Algebra 2" and not "fields of mathematics", they are names assigned to courses by specific schools. No one can tell you what is the difference between two specific courses except people at the specific school at which they are offered.

Actually, the book I'm learning from is called Algebra 2, so it's not really specific to any school.

It's easy to see through the deception, because, as you've noted, the material covered is not all that different.

So do think I should just skip everything I already know and only study the parts I don't know about yet?
 
Shawn Garsed said:
Actually, the book I'm learning from is called Algebra 2, so it's not really specific to any school.



So do think I should just skip everything I already know and only study the parts I don't know about yet?

I'm guessing that the book is a high school type of textbook. If not, my comments are far off the mark.

As far as skipping things you know, I see no problem with that, but a quick review never hurts either.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
47
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top