Algebraic Division: Solving Step by Step

  • Thread starter Thread starter Josh M.
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Division
Josh M.
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I didn't really know where to put this, but I thought I'd post it in General Math. Any way, here's the problem, I'd like it solved step by step, please.

a4 (a to the fourth power) + Oa3 (a to the third power) + 9a2 (a squared) + Oa

divided by:

a2 (a squared) - 3a + 9

Thanks in advance!

Josh
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
what is O?
 
Weird, you have the same name as me (mine is josh meyer). Anyway, here's the problem:

\frac{a^4+9a^2}{a^2-3a+9}

So we set up long division as you did, with 0's in for all the non-existent powers of x. It's hard to write this out on the site, so I am doing it on paper and describing it step by step:

1. a^2 goes into a^4 a^2 times, so write a^2 above the 9a^2

2. Multiply the a^2-3a+9 term by that a^2 and write all the terms obtained underneath their proper powers (cubics under cubics etc). Then change the signs on all these terms and subtract everything. (you should get 0a^4+3a^3+0a^2)

3. a^2 goes into 3a^3 3a times, so write this 3a above the 0a, multiply the a^2-3a+9 term by it, change the signs on these terms, and subtract. You ought to get
-9a^2-27a.

4. a^2 goes into -9a^2 -9 times, so write this above, multiply everything out, switch signs, and subtract.

so, the answer is a^2+3a-9 with a remainder of 81.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top