MHB Algebraic Expressions Simplified

  • Thread starter Thread starter loraboiago
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expressions
loraboiago
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
How does 3x or (x-5) equal 0 in the statement 3x(x-5)=0? I don't understand the logic behind it. Thank you!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you have the statement:

$$a\cdot b=0$$ where $$a\ne b$$

Then the only way it can be true is if either $$a=0$$ or $$b=0$$. This is called the zero-factor property.
 
MarkFL said:
If you have the statement:

$$a\cdot b=0$$ where $$a\ne b$$

Then the only way it can be true is if either $$a=0$$ or $$b=0$$. This is called the zero-factor property.

Thank you Mark for the quick and helpful response. The answer to this question went on to explain "3x(x-5)=0 provides an equation in which at least one of the expressions 3x or (x-5) is equal to 0. That translates into two possible values for x: 0 and 5."

I understand how one can equal 0 (thanks to you!), but how do I calculate the other possible value as being 5?
 
loraboiago said:
Thank you Mark for the quick and helpful response. The answer to this question went on to explain "3x(x-5)=0 provides an equation in which at least one of the expressions 3x or (x-5) is equal to 0. That translates into two possible values for x: 0 and 5."

I understand how one can equal 0 (thanks to you!), but how do I calculate the other possible value as being 5?

I would look at it as 3 factors being equal to zero:

$$3\cdot x\cdot(x-5)=0$$

Now, set all factors involving $x$ equal to zero, and then solve for $x$ in each equation:

$$x=0$$

$$x-5=0$$

The solutions to these equations will give you the solutions to the original equation.
 
MarkFL said:
I would look at it as 3 factors being equal to zero:

$$3\cdot x\cdot(x-5)=0$$

Now, set all factors involving $x$ equal to zero, and then solve for $x$ in each equation:

$$x=0$$

$$x-5=0$$

The solutions to these equations will give you the solutions to the original equation.

Ah got it! You are awesome. Thank you :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top