MHB Algebraic Extensions - Dummit and Foote, Propositions 11 and 12 .... ....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Dummit and Foote, Chapter 13 - Field Theory.

I am currently studying Section 13.2 : Algebraic Extensions

I need some help with an aspect of Propositions 11 and 12 ... ...

Propositions 11 and 12 read as follows:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/6606https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/6607
Now Proposition 11 states that the degree of $$F( \alpha )$$ over $$F$$ is equal to the degree of the minimum polynomial ... ... that is

$$[ F( \alpha ) \ : \ F ] = \text{ deg } m_\alpha (x) = \text{ deg } \alpha
$$

... ... BUT ... ...... ... Proposition 12 states that ... "if $$\alpha$$ is an element of an extension of degree $$n$$ over $$F$$, then $$\alpha$$ satisfies a polynomial of degree at most $$n$$ over $$F$$ ... ... "Doesn't Proposition 11 guarantee that the polynomial (the minimum polynomial) is actually of degree equal to $$n$$?Can someone please explain in simple terms how these statements are consistent?Help will be appreciated ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It appears you overlooked something simple. The second sentence of Proposition 12 considers an arbitrary extension of degree $n$, not $F(\alpha)$. For a concrete example, the number $\sqrt{3}$ is algebraic over $\Bbb Q$ of degree $2$, and it belongs to the extension $Q(\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3})$, of degree $4$ over $\Bbb Q$.
 
Euge said:
It appears you overlooked something simple. The second sentence of Proposition 12 considers an arbitrary extension of degree $n$, not $F(\alpha)$. For a concrete example, the number $\sqrt{3}$ is algebraic over $\Bbb Q$ of degree $2$, and it belongs to the extension $Q(\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3})$, of degree $4$ over $\Bbb Q$.
Thanks Euge ... appreciate your help ...

... now reading text again carefully ...

Peter
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K