Algorithms for atmospheric water balance method

AI Thread Summary
To estimate divergence of water vapor flux using NCEP/NCAR data, existing algorithms from ECMWF data may require modifications. Differences in data formatting and grid size between the two datasets could necessitate adjustments to the algorithms. It is important to consider potential biases in cloud variables and water vapor corrections in ECMWF data, as these may not apply to NCEP/NCAR. Implementing the algorithms directly without adaptation could lead to inaccurate results. Careful evaluation of the datasets is essential for accurate atmospheric water balance assessments.
ablaye
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi
I want to estimate divergence of water vapor flux in atmosphere with NCEP/NCAR data
I have the equations for that and i want the algorithms to implement it for NCEP/NCAR data.

I have a paper with algorithms for ECMWF data. Can i take this? or it required new algorithms for my data
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you describe the differences between the data sets?

You may need to change things related to data formatting or grid size.

I know that ERA has biases in its cloud variables so you may want to be aware if there are any for water vapor that are corrected since ECMWF is more like model data.
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

Learning data structures and algorithms in different programming languages
2
Replies
84
Views
671
Pressure in Gases: Boiling Water in a Can Explained
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Smoothing algorithm for real-world data
Replies
12
Views
2K
Optimal Size of Rocket Engine Nozzle for Vacuum Performance
Replies
26
Views
3K
Algorithms for Traveling Purchaser Problem (TPP)
Replies
6
Views
2K
I Discussion about least squares method
Replies
2
Views
2K
Non youtube courses and paid textbooks to learn algorithms?
Replies
8
Views
3K
Planetary scientist/atmospheric physicist - hi
Replies
3
Views
331
I Algorithmic model for primary decay chains
Replies
1
Views
1K
Chemistry How do we interpret the steps in the algorithm to balance a redox equation?
Replies
7
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top